Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Jan;51(1):56-60.
doi: 10.5946/ce.2017.059. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes in Centenarian Patients

Affiliations

Safety of Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tubes in Centenarian Patients

Zain A Sobani et al. Clin Endosc. 2018 Jan.

Abstract

Background/aims: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is a relatively safe procedure; however, no study has evaluated the safety of PEG tube placement in patients over the age of 100 years.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patient records for patients who underwent PEG tube placement. Thirty patients aged 100 years and older were identified and a random sample of 275 patients was selected for comparison.

Results: The mean age of the patients was 80.6±16.2 years. No procedure-related deaths or major complications were identified; the overall inpatient mortality rate was 7.6%. Minor complications were noted in 4% (n=12) of the patients. Centenarian patients were predominantly female (80% [n=24] vs. 54% [n=147], p=0.006), with a mean age of 100.5±0.9 years. There was no significant difference in procedural success rates (93.3% vs. 97.4%, p=0.222) or inpatient mortality (6.7% [n=2] vs. 7.7% [n=21], p=1.000) between the two groups. However, a higher minor complication rate was noted in the older patients (13.3% [n=4] vs. 2.9% [n=8], p=0.022).

Conclusions: Success rates, major complications and inpatient mortality associated with PEG tubes in patients aged over 100 years are comparable to those observed in relatively younger patients at our center; however minor complication rates are relatively higher. These findings lead us to believe that PEG tubes may be safely attempted in carefully selected patients in this subset of the population.

Keywords: Aged, 80 and over; Geriatric patients; Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no financial conflicts of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Rates of unsuccessful procedure (p=0.222), complications (p=0.022), and in-hospital mortality (p=1) between the two groups, as well as those reported in the literature. Note that the data from literature is reported as ranges in the discussion; the upper limit of the range is plotted on the graph. Statistical analysis is only between our patients, data from literature is plotted for illustrative purposes.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gauderer MW, Ponsky JL, Izant RJ., Jr Gastrostomy without laparotomy: a percutaneous endoscopic technique. J Pediatr Surg. 1980;15:872–875. - PubMed
    1. McClave SA, Chang WK. Complications of enteral access. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003;58:739–751. - PubMed
    1. Chang WK, Hsieh TY. Safety of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in high-risk patients. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28 Suppl 4:118–122. - PubMed
    1. DeLegge MH, Saltzman JR, Lipman TO, Robson KM. Alphen aan den Rijn: Wolters Kluwer Health; Gastrostomy tubes: complications and their management [database on the Internet] UpToDate; 2015 [updated 2015 Apr 15; cited 2017 Mar]. Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/gastrostomy-tubes-complications-and-th....
    1. Larson DE, Burton DD, Schroeder KW, DiMagno EP. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Indications, success, complications, and mortality in 314 consecutive patients. Gastroenterology. 1987;93:48–52. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources