Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul;78(4):597-607.
doi: 10.15288/jsad.2017.78.597.

A Latent Profile Analysis of Aggression and Victimization Across Relationship Types Among Veterans Who Use Substances

Affiliations

A Latent Profile Analysis of Aggression and Victimization Across Relationship Types Among Veterans Who Use Substances

RaeAnn E Anderson et al. J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective: This study examined patterns of violence victimization and aggression in both intimate partner and nonpartner relationships among U.S. military veterans using latent profile analysis to identify subtypes of violence involvement.

Method: Participants were 839 substance use treatment-seeking veterans (93% male) from a large Veterans Affairs Medical Center who completed screening measures for a randomized controlled trial.

Results: Past-year violence involvement, including both intimate partner violence (IPV) and nonpartner violence (NPV), was common in the sample, although NPV occurred at somewhat higher rates. When we included either IPV or NPV aggression or victimization, more than 40% reported involvement with physical violence, 30% with violence involving injury, and 86% with psychological aggression. Latent profile analysis including both aggression and victimization in partner and nonpartner relationships indicated a four-profile solution: no/low violence (NLV; n = 377), predominantly IPV (n = 219), predominantly NPV (n = 134), and high general violence (HGV; n = 109). Multinomial logistic regression analyses revealed that, compared with the NLV group, the remaining three groups differed in age, cocaine use, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms, and legal involvement. Legal issues appeared to differentiate the profiles most, with the predominantly NPV and HGV profiles reporting more instances of driving under the influence and the HGV profile reporting legal problems related to aggression.

Conclusions: IPV and NPV are fairly common among veterans seeking substance use treatment. The clinical characteristics of violence profiles indicate that cocaine use, PTSD symptoms, and legal involvement are treatment needs that vary with violence profile and may be useful for clinical decision making.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Means by violence domain and latent profile. IPV = intimate partner violence; NPV = nonpartner violence; PV = physical violence victimization; IV = injury victimization; PsyV = psychological victimization; PA = physical violence aggression; IA = injury aggression; PsyA = psychological aggression; PNPV = predominantly NPV; PIPV = predominantly IPV; HGV = high general violence; NLV = no/low violence.

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 4th ed. Washington, DC: Author; 1994.
    1. Ansara D. L., Hindin M. J. Exploring gender differences in the patterns of intimate partner violence in Canada: A latent class approach. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2010;64:849–854. doi:10.1136/jech.2009.095208. - PubMed
    1. Archer J. Sex differences in aggression between heterosexual partners: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin. 2000;126:651–680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651. - PubMed
    1. Bagwell-Gray M. E., Messing J. T., Baldwin-White A. Intimate partner sexual violence: A review of terms, definitions, and prevalence. Trauma, Violence & Abuse. 2015;16:316–335. doi:10.1177/1524838014557290. - PubMed
    1. Beck C. J. A., Anderson E. R., O’Hara K. L., Benjamin G. A. Patterns of intimate partner violence in a large, epidemiological sample of divorcing couples. Journal of Family Psychology. 2013;27:743–753. doi:10.1037/a0034182. - PubMed