Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep;225(3):361-365.
doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.06.013. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer

Affiliations

Oncologic Safety of Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy in Women with Breast Cancer

Barbara L Smith et al. J Am Coll Surg. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) has gained popularity for breast cancer treatment and prevention. There are limited data about long-term oncologic safety of this procedure.

Study design: We reviewed oncologic outcomes of consecutive therapeutic NSM at a single institution. Nipple-sparing mastectomy was offered to patients with no radiologic or clinical evidence of nipple involvement.

Results: There were 2,182 NSM performed from 2007 to 2016. Long-term outcomes were assessed in the 311 NSM performed in 2007 to 2012 for Stages 0 to 3 breast cancer; 240 (77%) NSM were for invasive cancer and 71 (23%) were for ductal carcinoma in situ. At 51 months median follow-up, 17 patients developed a recurrence of their cancer. Estimated disease-free survival was 95.7% at 3 years and 92.3% at 5 years. There were 11 (3.7%) locoregional recurrences and 8 (2.7%) distant recurrences; 2 patients had simultaneous locoregional and distant recurrences. There were 2 breast cancer-related deaths in patients with isolated distant recurrences. No patient in the entire 2,182 NSM cohort has had a recurrence in the retained nipple-areola complex.

Conclusions: Rates of locoregional and distant recurrence are acceptably low after nipple-sparing mastectomy in patients with breast cancer. No patient in our series has had a recurrence involving the retained nipple areola complex.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

  • Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy.
    Jensen JA. Jensen JA. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Jan;226(1):108. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2017.11.001. J Am Coll Surg. 2018. PMID: 29274648 No abstract available.

References

REFERENCES

    1. Coopey SB, Tang R, Lei L, et al. Increasing eligibility for nipple-sparing mastectomy. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:3218-3222.
    1. Krajewski AC, Boughey JC, Degnim AC, et al. Expanded indications and improved outcomes for nipple-sparing mastectomy over time. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3317-3323.
    1. Tang R, Coopey SB, Colwell AS, et al. Nipple-sparing mastectomy in irradiated breasts: selecting patients to minimize complications. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3331-3337.
    1. Peled AW, Foster RD, Stover AC, et al. Outcomes after total skin-sparing mastectomy and immediate reconstruction in 657 breasts. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:3402-3409.
    1. Djohan R, Gage E, Gatherwright J, et al. Patient satisfaction following nipple-sparing mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction: an 8-year outcome study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;125:818-829.

Publication types