Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep 19;2(1):22.
doi: 10.4102/ajod.v2i1.22. eCollection 2013.

Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with physical disabilities: A systematic review

Nondwe B Mlenzana  1 , Jose M Frantz  1 , Anthea J Rhoda  1 , Arne H Eide  2   3
Affiliations
Review

Barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with physical disabilities: A systematic review

Nondwe B Mlenzana et al. Afr J Disabil. .

Abstract

Background: As health care practitioners, it is important to have an understanding of the common barriers to and facilitators of the rehabilitation services we provide.

Objectives: This article aimed to review the relevant literature regarding barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services for people with disabilities.

Method: Articles for the period 1990-2010 using descriptors related to rehabilitation services, barriers, facilitators and the physically disabled population were retrieved for this review.

Results: A total of 19 article titles were identified from references of other articles but following application of the inclusion criteria selected for this review, only six articles were chosen. Five of these articles were qualitative studies and one was a quantitative study. Barriers and facilitators regarding rehabilitation services highlighted by participants in the studies included a perception that health professionals have a lack of understanding of rehabilitation for people with disabilities and there was a lack of information sharing from health professionals about the rehabilitation process. On the other hand some participants reported that health professionals demonstrated confidence in the disability and rehabilitation process during consultation and highlighted that their needs were met by the rehabilitation professionals.

Conclusion: Even though there were few studies highlighting the barriers to and facilitators of rehabilitation services, they highlighted that there are gaps in the process of rehabilitation services provided. It would be advisable for health professionals to take cognisance of the issues highlighted in this study in order to make rehabilitation services more effective.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationship(s) which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search strategy followed for articles used in this study (Moher et al. 2009).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. African National Congress (ANC) , 1994, A national health plan for South Africa, viewed 01 June 2011, from http://www.anc.org.za/show.php - PubMed
    1. Boyle S., 2011, ‘United Kingdom (England): Health system review’, Health Systems in Transition 13(1), 1–486. PMid: - PubMed
    1. Cott C., 2004, ‘Client-centred rehabilitation: Client perspectives’, Disability and Rehabilitation 26(24), 1411–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638280400000237, PMid: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Crisp R., 2000, ‘A qualitative study of the perceptions of individuals with disabilities concerning health and rehabilitation professionals’, Disability and Society 15(2), 355–367. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09687590025720 - DOI
    1. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) , 2004, Public Health Resource Unit, Institute of Health Science, Oxford, viewed 13 September 09 2011, from http://www.casp-uk.net

LinkOut - more resources