Exploring the impact of wheelchair design on user function in a rural South African setting
- PMID: 28730031
- PMCID: PMC5433480
- DOI: 10.4102/ajod.v4i1.171
Exploring the impact of wheelchair design on user function in a rural South African setting
Abstract
Background: Wheelchairs provide mobility that can enhance function and community integration. Function in a wheelchair is influenced by wheelchair design.
Objectives: To explore the impact of wheelchair design on user function and the variables that guided wheelchair prescription in the study setting.
Method: A mixed-method, descriptive design using convenience sampling was implemented. Quantitative data were collected from 30 wheelchair users using the functioning every day with a Wheelchair Scale and a Wheelchair Specification Checklist. Qualitative data were collected from ten therapists who prescribed wheelchairs to these users, through interviews. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to identify relationships, and content analysis was undertaken to identify emerging themes in qualitative data.
Results: Wheelchairs with urban designs were issued to 25 (83%) participants. Wheelchair size, fit, support and functional features created challenges concerning transport, operating the wheelchair, performing personal tasks, and indoor and outdoor mobility. Users using wheelchairs designed for use in semi-rural environments achieved significantly better scores regarding the appropriateness of the prescribed wheelchair than those using wheelchairs designed for urban use (p = <0.01). Therapists prescribed the basic, four-wheel folding frame design most often because of a lack of funding, lack of assessment, lack of skills and user choice.
Conclusion: Issuing urban type wheelchairs to users living in rural settings might have a negative effect on users' functional outcomes. Comprehensive assessments, further training and research, on long term cost and quality of life implications, regarding provision of a suitable wheelchair versus a cheaper less suitable option is recommended.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they have no financial or personal relationships which may have inappropriately influenced them in writing this article.
Figures



References
-
- Amos G. & Winter V., 2013, ‘International design engineering technical conferences and computers and information in engineering conference’, Volume 5: 25th International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology; ASME 2013 Power Transmission and Gearing Conference Portland, Oregon, USA, August 4–7.
-
- Borg J., Larsson S., Östergren P., Rahman A., Bari N. & Khan N., 2012, ‘User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use: A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh’, BMC Health Services Research 12(330). http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6963-12-330 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Chakwizira J., Nhemachena C., Dube S. & G Maponya G., 2010, Rural travel and disability in Leroro and Moremela villages, South Africa, viewed 07 August 2014, from http://researchspace.csif.co.za/dspace/handle/10204/4716
-
- Di Marco A., Russel M. & Masters M., 2003, ‘Standards for wheelchair prescription’, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal 50(1), 30–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1630.2003.00316.x - DOI
-
- Dryden D.M., Saunders L.D., Rowe B.H., May L.A., Yiannakoulias N., Svenson L.W., Schopflocher D.P. & Voaklander D.C., 2003, ‘The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Alberta, Canada’, The Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 30(2), 113–121. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources