Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Aug;83(2):241-248.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001517.

An adapted Clavien-Dindo scoring system in trauma as a clinically meaningful nonmortality endpoint

David N Naumann  1 , Laura E Vincent, Nicola Pearson, Alastair Beaven, Iain M Smith, Kieran Smith, Emma Toman, Helen R Dorrance, Keith Porter, Charles E Wade, Bryan A Cotton, John B Holcomb, Mark J Midwinter
Affiliations
Observational Study

An adapted Clavien-Dindo scoring system in trauma as a clinically meaningful nonmortality endpoint

David N Naumann et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Background: There is no consensus on reporting nonmortality trauma complications in a graded manner. The Clavien-Dindo scale of complications was originally for elective surgery and requires adaptation to provide meaningful data for trauma patients. In particular, the original score does not account for those treated without surgery. We report an adapted Clavien-Dindo in trauma (ACDiT) scale and apply it to patients managed operatively and nonoperatively.

Methods: A combined prospective and retrospective international multicenter observational study was undertaken to apply the ACDiT scale to 484 trauma patients at three university teaching hospitals (Birmingham, England (n = 303); Houston, Texas (n = 113); and Glasgow, Scotland (n = 68)). These included both intensive care unit (ICU) and non-ICU-managed patients. The Clavien-Dindo scoring system was adapted for trauma patients based on consensus amongst an international collaboration of trauma specialists at these sites. Data included whether initial patients were managed operatively or nonoperatively. Complication grades were compared with hospital-free and ICU-free days as other outcome measures of patient morbidity.

Results: Two hundred seventeen (44.8%) of 484 patients experienced complications, of whom 61 (28.1%) of 217 died (grade V). The remainder consisted of grades I (n = 20), II (n = 60), III (n = 24), and IV (n = 52). There was a strong association between higher ACDiT grade category and lower number of hospital-free and ICU-free days (p < 0.01). Eighty-eight patients with complications did not require surgery, validating the score's usefulness in patients managed nonoperatively.

Conclusion: The ACDiT scale can be used to grade the severity of posttrauma complications in patients managed both operatively and nonoperatively. It provides clinically meaningful data for morbidity and mortality meetings and other quality improvement exercises.

Level of evidence: Prognostic, level IV.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01545232.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. Although some authors are affiliated to the UK Defence Medical Services, their opinions are their own, and do not necessarily represent those of the UK Defence Medical Services.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram for patient selection and scoring according to the adapted Clavien-Dindo in trauma scoring system
Figure 2
Figure 2
Simplified flowchart for assigning scores for the adapted Clavien-Dindo in trauma (ACDiT) scale
Figure 3
Figure 3. Relationship between ACDiT grade and other morbidity endpoints
A. hospital-free days and B. ICU-free days. Horizontal bars represent median values; upper and lower boundaries of boxes represent the 25th to 75th percentiles (i.e. interquartile range); whiskers represent 10th – 90th percentiles. Statistical significance using Dunn’s multiple comparisons test is illustrated using *p<0.05; **p<0.005; ***p<0.001; and ****p<0.0001.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Correlation between ACDiT grade for clinical scenarios and the ranking of severity agreed by the Patient and Public Involvement group
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Holcomb JB, Tilley BC, Baraniuk S, Fox EE, Wade CE, Podbielski JM, del Junco DJ, Brasel KJ, Bulger EM, Callcut RA, et al. Transfusion of plasma, platelets, and red blood cells in a 1:1:1 vs a 1:1:2 ratio and mortality in patients with severe trauma: the PROPPR randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2015;313(5):471–82. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American College of Surgeons. Committee on Trauma. Resources for optimal care of the injured patient. Chicago, Ill.: American College of Surgeons, Committee on Trauma; 1990.
    1. Sarkar B, Brunsvold ME, Cherry-Bukoweic JR, Hemmila MR, Park PK, Raghavendran K, Wahl WL, Wang SC, Napolitano LM. American College of Surgeons’ Committee on Trauma Performance Improvement and Patient Safety program: maximal impact in a mature trauma center. J Trauma. 2011;71(5):1447–53. discussion 53–4. - PubMed
    1. Clavien PA, Sanabria JR, Strasberg SM. Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy. Surgery. 1992;111(5):518–26. - PubMed
    1. Mentula PJ, Leppaniemi AK. Applicability of the Clavien-Dindo classification to emergency surgical procedures: a retrospective cohort study on 444 consecutive patients. Patient Saf Surg. 2014;8:31. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data