Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Sep:188:60-68.
doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.005. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals

Affiliations

Neighborhood SES is particularly important to the cardiovascular health of low SES individuals

Jennifer Morozink Boylan et al. Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Rationale: Health disparities defined by neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) are well established; it is less well understood whether neighborhood SES is differentially associated with health depending on one's own SES.

Objective: The double jeopardy hypothesis, collective resources model, fundamental cause theory, and relative deprivation hypothesis support differential patterns of association between neighborhood and individual SES with health. The first three models suggest that higher neighborhood SES predicts health more strongly among lower, as compared to higher, SES individuals. The relative deprivation hypothesis suggests that higher SES neighborhoods bring no extra health benefit to low SES individuals and could even bring a health deficit. This study examined competing hypotheses with prospective associations between cardiovascular (CV) health and individual SES, neighborhood SES, and their interaction.

Method: Data were from two waves of the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study (N = 1012), a national survey of adults ages 25 and older at baseline. Neighborhood SES was a composite of five census tract-level SES indicators from the 1990 census. Individual SES was a composite of educational attainment and household income at wave one (1995-1996). CV health at wave two (2004-2008), was computed as a composite based on smoking status, body mass index, physical activity, diet, total cholesterol, blood pressure, and glucose.

Results: Individual and neighborhood SES were each associated with CV health net of baseline health status and other covariates. Interactions between individual and neighborhood SES showed that higher neighborhood SES was associated with better CV health for those of lower, not higher, individual SES.

Conclusion: Results are consistent with the double jeopardy hypothesis, the collective resources model, and the fundamental cause theory, but not with a relative deprivation hypothesis. Results suggest that additional attention to the neighborhood socioeconomic context of lower SES individuals may reduce SES disparities in cardiovascular health.

Keywords: Cardiovascular health; Double jeopardy hypothesis; Neighborhood socioeconomic status; Socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Histogram of cardiovascular health scores from wave two of the MIDUS biomarker sample.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Interaction between neighborhood and individual SES in the prospective prediction of cardiovascular health. Lines represent the association between neighborhood SES and cardiovascular health at the mean and plus and minus one standard deviation of individual SES. Simple slopes are significantly different from zero at low and mean levels of individual SES. Estimated values reflect statistical adjustment for age, gender, race, physical activity, smoking, chronic conditions, and hypertension, cholesterol, and diabetes medication at baseline.

References

    1. Arcaya MC, Tucker-Seeley RD, Kim R, Schnake-Mahl A, So M, Subramanian SV. Research on neighborhood effects on health in the United States: a systematic review of study characteristics. Social Science and Medicine. 2016;168:16–29. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bird CE, Seeman T, Escarce JJ, Basurto-Dávila R, Finch BK, Dubowitz T, Lurie N. Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and biological “wear and tear” in a nationally representative sample of US adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 2010;64(10):860–5. http://doi.org/10.1136/jech.2008.084814. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boardman JD, Finch BK, Ellison CG, Williams DR, Jackson JS. Neighborhood disadvantage, stress, and drug use among adults. Journal of Health and Social Behavior. 2001;42(2):151–65. - PubMed
    1. Borrell LN, Diez Roux AV, Rose K, Catellier D, Clark BL. Neighbourhood characteristics and mortality in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2004;33:398–407. - PubMed
    1. Brim OG, Ryff CD, Kessler RC. How healthy are we: A national study of well-being at midlife. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press; 2004.

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources