Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 21;4(2):e7.
doi: 10.2196/rehab.7511.

Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application

Alessandro Peretti  1 , Francesco Amenta  1 , Seyed Khosrow Tayebati  1 , Giulio Nittari  1 , Syed Sarosh Mahdi  1
Affiliations
Review

Telerehabilitation: Review of the State-of-the-Art and Areas of Application

Alessandro Peretti et al. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. .

Abstract

Background: Telemedicine applications have been increasing due to the development of new computer science technologies and of more advanced telemedical devices. Various types of telerehabilitation treatments and their relative intensities and duration have been reported.

Objective: The objective of this review is to provide a detailed overview of the rehabilitation techniques for remote sites (telerehabilitation) and their fields of application, with analysis of the benefits and the drawbacks related to use. We discuss future applications of telerehabilitation techniques with an emphasis on the development of high-tech devices, and on which new tools and applications can be used in the future.

Methods: We retrieved relevant information and data on telerehabilitation from books, articles and online materials using the Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) "telerehabilitation," "telemedicine," and "rehabilitation," as well as "disabling pathologies."

Results: Telerehabilitation can be considered as a branch of telemedicine. Although this field is considerably new, its use has rapidly grown in developed countries. In general, telerehabilitation reduces the costs of both health care providers and patients compared with traditional inpatient or person-to-person rehabilitation. Furthermore, patients who live in remote places, where traditional rehabilitation services may not be easily accessible, can benefit from this technology. However, certain disadvantages of telerehabilitation, including skepticism on the part of patients due to remote interaction with their physicians or rehabilitators, should not be underestimated.

Conclusions: This review evaluated different application fields of telerehabilitation, highlighting its benefits and drawbacks. This study may be a starting point for improving approaches and devices for telerehabilitation. In this context, patients' feedback may be important to adapt rehabilitation techniques and approaches to their needs, which would subsequently help to improve the quality of rehabilitation in the future. The need for proper training and education of people involved in this new and emerging form of intervention for more effective treatment can't be overstated.

Keywords: health care; rehabilitation; remote rehabilitation assistance; telemedicine; telerehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Number of patients treated from 1998 to 2008 through telerehabilitation techniques.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) flowchart.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Ackerman MJ, Filart R, Burgess LP, Lee I, Poropatich RK. Developing next-generation telehealth tools and technologies: patients, systems, and data perspectives. Telemed J E Health. 2010;16(1):93–5. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2009.0153. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20043711 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rogante M, Grigioni M, Cordella D, Giacomozzi C. Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation. 2010;27(4):287–304. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2010-0612. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zampolini M, Todeschini E, Bernabeu GM, Hermens H, Ilsbroukx S, Macellari V, Magni R, Rogante M, Scattareggia MS, Vollenbroek M, Giacomozzi C. Tele-rehabilitation: present and future. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2008;44(2):125–34. http://www.iss.it/publ/anna/2008/2/442125.pdf - PubMed
    1. Carey JR, Durfee WK, Bhatt E, Nagpal A, Weinstein SA, Anderson KM, Lewis SM. Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;21(3):216–32. doi: 10.1177/1545968306292381. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Parmanto B, Saptono A. Telerehabilitation: state-of-the-art from an informatics perspective. Int J Telerehabil. 2009;1(1):73–84. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/25945164 - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources