The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
- PMID: 28733366
- PMCID: PMC5539308
- DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1
The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
Abstract
Objectives: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery.
Methods: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included.
Results: The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders.
Conclusions: The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery.Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423-432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1.
Keywords: Bone defects; Bone grafts; Demineralised bone matrix.
© 2017 Arts et al.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest Statement: None declared.
References
-
- Brinker MR, O’Connor DP. The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 2004;86-A:290-297. - PubMed
-
- Cypher TJ, Grossman JP. Biological principles of bone graft healing. J Foot Ankle Surg 1996;35:413-417. - PubMed
-
- Urist MR. Bone: formation by autoinduction. Science 1965;150:893-899. - PubMed
-
- Geesink RG, Hoefnagels NH, Bulstra SK. Osteogenic activity of OP-1 bone morphogenetic protein (BMP-7) in a human fibular defect. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1999;81-B:710-718. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous
