Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Sep;4(3):340-348.
doi: 10.1007/s40572-017-0151-2.

The Global Burden of Occupational Disease

Affiliations
Review

The Global Burden of Occupational Disease

Lesley Rushton. Curr Environ Health Rep. 2017 Sep.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Burden of occupational disease estimation contributes to understanding of both magnitude and relative importance of different occupational hazards and provides essential information for targeting risk reduction. This review summarises recent key findings and discusses their impact on occupational regulation and practice.

Recent findings: New methods have been developed to estimate burden of occupational disease that take account of the latency of many chronic diseases and allow for exposure trends and workforce turnover. Results from these studies have shown in several countries and globally that, in spite of improvements in workplace technology, practices and exposures over the last decades, occupational hazards remain an important cause of ill health and mortality worldwide. Major data gaps have been identified particularly regarding exposure information. Reliable data on employment and disease are also lacking especially in developing countries. Burden of occupational disease estimates form an important part of decision-making processes.

Keywords: Burden estimation; Cancer; Exposure assessment; Impact; Occupation; Respiratory disease.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

Lesley Rushton declares that she has no conflicts of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human and animal subjects performed by the author.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Numbers of occupationally related cancer registrations (2011) by carcinogen and major industry sector
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Numbers of global occupationally related deaths in 2015 by WHO region and major disease group (This figure was derived from data available on the following site: GBD Compare. IHME, University of Washington; 2016. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/. Accessed January 2017.). b Numbers of global occupationally related DALYS in 2015 by WHO region and major disease group. (This figure was derived from data available on the following site: GBD Compare. IHME, University of Washington; 2016. https://vizhub.healthdata.org/gbd-compare/. Accessed January 2017)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Morrell S, Kerr C, Driscoll T, Taylor R, Salkeld G, Corbett S. Best estimate of the magnitude of mortality due to occupational exposure to hazardous substances. Occup Environ Med. 1998;55:634–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Landrigan PL, Schechter CB, Lipton JM, Fahs MC, Schwartz J. Environmental pollutants and disease in American children: estimates of morbidity, mortality and costs for lead poisoning, asthma, cancer, and developmental disabilities. Environ Health Perspect. 2002;110:721–728. doi: 10.1289/ehp.02110721. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Loon AJM, Kant IJ, Swaen GMH, Goldbohm RA, Kremer AM, Van den Brandt PA. Occupational exposure to carcinogens and risk of lung cancer: results from The Netherlands cohort study. Occup Environ Med. 1997;54:817–824. doi: 10.1136/oem.54.11.817. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Deschamps F, Barouh M, Deslee G, Prevost A, Munck J. Estimates of work-related cancers in workers exposed to carcinogens. Occup Med. 2006;56:204–209. doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqj038. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hodgson JT, Darnton A. The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure. Ann Occup Hyg. 2000;44:565–601. doi: 10.1016/S0003-4878(00)00045-4. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types