Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Oct:182:8-17.
doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2017.07.004. Epub 2017 Jul 19.

Conjunctival Autograft Versus Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Treatment of Pterygium: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Conjunctival Autograft Versus Amniotic Membrane Transplantation for Treatment of Pterygium: Findings From a Cochrane Systematic Review

Elizabeth Clearfield et al. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: To summarize key findings from a systematic review of the effectiveness and risks of conjunctival autograft (CAG) compared with amniotic membrane transplant (AMT) for pterygium.

Design: Cochrane systematic review.

Methods: We included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which CAG and AMT had been compared for primary or recurrent pterygia. The primary outcome was recurrence of pterygium ≥1 mm onto the cornea by 3 and 6 months post surgery. We adhered to Cochrane methods for trial selection, data extraction, risk of bias evaluation, and data synthesis.

Results: Twenty RCTs with 1866 participants (1947 eyes) were included. Pterygium recurrence 6 months after surgery ranged from 3.3% to 16.7% in the CAG group and 6.4% to 42.3% in the AMT group based on data from 1021 eyes in 10 RCTs. Estimated risk ratios from meta-analysis indicated that CAG-treated eyes had a 47% lower risk of recurrence 6 months after surgery compared with the AMT group (RR, 0.53, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33-0.85). For 96 eyes with recurrent pterygium, the risk of recurrence 6 months after CAG was reduced by 55% compared with AMT (risk ratio [RR], 0.45, 95% CI, 0.21-0.99). Three-month recurrence rates were similar for CAG and AMT based on data from 538 eyes (6 RCTs).

Conclusions: CAG was more effective than AMT to prevent pterygium recurrence by 6 months post surgery, especially in recurrent pterygia. CAG-treated eyes had half the recurrence rates of AMT-treated eyes. Future RCTs should assess changes in patient-reported outcomes (symptoms, cosmesis) and visual acuity, and evaluate effects of surgical variations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Identification and selection of trials that compared conjunctival autograft with amniotic membrane transplantation for pterygium.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Risk of bias for individual trials by domain assessed. Green, low risk of bias; yellow, unclear/unknown risk of bias; red, high risk of bias.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot showing estimated risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence of pterygium 3 months after surgery
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot showing estimated risk ratios (RRs) with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for recurrence of pterygium 6 months after surgery

References

    1. Droutsas K, Sekundo W. Epidemiology of pterygium. A review. Ophthalmologe. 2010;107(6):511–2. 514–516. - PubMed
    1. Liu L, Wu J, Geng J, Yuan Z, Huang D. Geographical prevalence and risk factors for pterygium: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2013;3(11):1–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hirst LW. Recurrent pterygium surgery using pterygium extended removal followed by extended conjunctival transplant: recurrence rate and cosmesis. Ophthalmology. 2009;116(7):1278–1286. - PubMed
    1. Dusenbery KE, Alul IH, Holland EJ, Khan FM, Levitt SH. β Irradiation of recurrent ptergia: results and complications. International Journal of Radiation Oncology* Biology* Physics. 1992;24(2):315–320. - PubMed
    1. Al Fayez MF. Limbal versus conjunctival autograft transplantation for advanced and recurrent pterygium. Ophthalmology. 2002;109(9):1752–1755. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources