Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Apr;37(2):129-133.
doi: 10.14366/usg.17032. Epub 2017 Jun 8.

Ultrasonographic features of the normal filum terminale

Myoungae Kwon  1 , Bo-Kyung Je  1 , Doran Hong  1 , Byung Min Choi  2
Affiliations

Ultrasonographic features of the normal filum terminale

Myoungae Kwon et al. Ultrasonography. 2018 Apr.

Abstract

Purpose: The filum terminale (FT) is a fibrous band that connects the conus medullaris to the posterior body of the coccyx. Considering the advances of ultrasonography (US) technology and improvements in the resolution of US images, we aimed to re-establish the US features of the normal FT in infants younger than 6 months of age.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 30 spinal US scans, stored as video clips. The internal structure of the FT and the marginal echogenicity of the FT were assessed, and transverse and longitudinal US were compared.

Results: On US, a central echogenic line was defined in 18 (60%) normal FTs; however, there was no visible internal structure in 12 cases (40%). The marginal echogenicity of the FT was hyperechoic in eight cases (27%) in comparison with the cauda equina and was isoechoic in 22 cases (73%). In differentiating the normal FT from the surrounding nerve roots, transverse US was superior in 18 cases (60%), while longitudinal US was superior in two cases (7%).

Conclusion: On US, the central canal of the FT was defined in 60% of normal FTs. Hyperechoic marginal echogenicity and the use of transverse US were helpful in distinguishing the normal FT from the nerve roots of the cauda equina.

Keywords: Cauda equina; Infant, newborn; Spinal cord; Ultrasonography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.. Spinal ultrasonography in a 1-month-old boy.
A, B. The central canal of the filum terminale (arrows) is visible on transverse (A) and the longitudinal (B) ultrasonography. The marginal echogenicity of the filum terminale is hyperechoic in comparison to the nerve roots of the cauda equina.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.. Spinal ultrasonography in an 8-day-old girl.
A, B. The marginal echogenicity of the filum terminale (arrows) is hyperechoic in comparison to the nerve roots of the cauda equina on transverse (A) and the longitudinal (B) ultrasonography.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 3.. Spinal ultrasonography in a 10-day-old girl.
A, B. The filum terminale (arrow) is defined on the transverse ultrasonography (A), while the filum terminale is not separated from the nerve roots of the cauda equina on the longitudinal ultrasonography (B).
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hansasuta A, Tubbs RS, Oakes WJ. Filum terminale fusion and dural sac termination: study in 27 cadavers. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1999;30:176–179. - PubMed
    1. Tubbs RS, Murphy RL, Kelly DR, Lott R, Salter EG, Oakes WJ. The filum terminale externum. J Neurosurg Spine. 2005;3:149–152. - PubMed
    1. Fontes RB, Saad F, Soares MS, de Oliveira F, Pinto FC, Liberti EA. Ultrastructural study of the filum terminale and its elastic fibers. Neurosurgery. 2006;58:978–984. - PubMed
    1. Selcuki M, Vatansever S, Inan S, Erdemli E, Bagdatoglu C, Polat A. Is a filum terminale with a normal appearance really normal? Childs Nerv Syst. 2003;19:3–10. - PubMed
    1. Choi BH, Kim RC, Suzuki M, Choe W. The ventriculus terminalis and filum terminale of the human spinal cord. Hum Pathol. 1992;23:916–920. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources