Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups
- PMID: 28738424
- PMCID: PMC5783793
- DOI: 10.14573/altex.1703231
Use of high-throughput in vitro toxicity screening data in cancer hazard evaluations by IARC Monograph Working Groups
Abstract
Evidence regarding carcinogenic mechanisms serves a critical role in International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monograph evaluations. Three recent IARC Working Groups pioneered inclusion of the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) ToxCast program high-throughput screening (HTS) data to supplement other mechanistic evidence. In Monograph V110, HTS profiles were compared between perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) and prototypical activators across multiple nuclear receptors. For Monograph V112-113, HTS assays were mapped to 10 key characteristics of carcinogens identified by an IARC expert group, and systematically considered as an additional mechanistic data stream. Both individual assay results and ToxPi-based rankings informed mechanistic evaluations. Activation of multiple nuclear receptors in HTS assays showed that PFOA targets not only peroxisome proliferator activated receptors, but also other receptors. ToxCast assays substantially covered 5 of 10 key characteristics, corroborating literature evidence of "induces oxidative stress" and "alters cell proliferation, cell death or nutrient supply" and filling gaps for "modulates receptor-mediated effects." Thus, ToxCast HTS data were useful both in evaluating specific mechanistic hypotheses and in contributing to the overall evaluation of mechanistic evidence. However, additional HTS assays are needed to provide more comprehensive coverage of the 10 key characteristics of carcinogens that form the basis of current IARC mechanistic evaluations.
Keywords: in vitro; high throughput screening; carcinogenicity; mechanisms.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
References
-
- Ahrens L, Bundschuh M. Fate and effects of poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2014;33:1921–1929. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/etc.2663. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Attene-Ramos MS, Miller N, Huang R, et al. The Tox21 robotic platform for the assessment of environmental chemicals–from vision to reality. Drug Discov Today. 2013;18:716–723. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drudis.2013.05.015. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Auerbach S, Filer D, Reif D, et al. Prioritizing Environmental Chemicals for Obesity and Diabetes Outcomes Research: A Screening Approach Using ToxCast High Throughput Data. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510456. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Benbrahim-Tallaa L, Lauby-Secretan B, Loomis D, et al. Carcinogenicity of perfluorooctanoic acid, tetrafluoroethylene, dichloromethane, 1,2-dichloropropane, and 1,3-propane sultone. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:924–925. - PubMed
-
- Biegel LB, Liu RC, Hurtt ME, et al. Effects of ammonium perfluorooctanoate on Leydig cell function: in vitro, in vivo, and ex vivo studies. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1995;134:18–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/taap.1995.1164. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Research Materials
