Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 May;41(3):254-266.
doi: 10.1080/10790268.2017.1350340. Epub 2017 Jul 24.

A systematic review of the effectiveness of task-specific rehabilitation interventions for improving independent sitting and standing function in spinal cord injury

Affiliations

A systematic review of the effectiveness of task-specific rehabilitation interventions for improving independent sitting and standing function in spinal cord injury

Cynthia M Tse et al. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 May.

Abstract

Context: Impaired balance function after a spinal cord injury (SCI) hinders performance of daily activities.

Objective: To assess the evidence on the effectiveness of task-specific training on sitting and standing function in individuals with SCI across the continuum of care.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted on literature published to June 2016 using people (acute or chronic SCI), task-specific interventions compared to conventional physical therapy, and outcome (sitting or standing balance function). The PEDro scale was used to investigate the susceptibility to bias and trial quality of the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A standardized mean difference (SMD) was conducted to investigate the effect size for interventions with sitting or standing balance outcomes.

Results: Nineteen articles were identified; three RCTs, two prospective controlled trials, one cross-over study, nine pre-post studies and four prospective cohort studies. RCT and cross-over studies were rated from 6 to 8 indicating good quality on the PEDro scale. The SMD of task-specific interventions in sitting compared to active and inactive (no training) control groups was -0.09 (95% CI: -0.663 to 0.488) and 0.39 (95% CI: -0.165 to 0.937) respectively, indicating that the addition of task-specific exercises did not affect sit and reach test performance significantly. Similarly, the addition of BWS training did not significantly affect BBS compared to conventional physical therapy -0.36 (95% CI: -0.840 to 0.113). Task-specific interventions reported in uncontrolled trials revealed positive effects on sitting and standing balance function.

Conclusion: Few RCT studies provided balance outcomes, and those that were evaluated indicate negligible effect sizes. Given the importance of balance control underpinning all aspects of daily activities, there is a need for further research to evaluate specific features of training interventions to improve both sitting and standing balance function in SCI.

Keywords: Gait; Postural balance; Rehabilitation; Review; Spinal cord injuries.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A PRISMA flow diagram of the studies included in the review.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A forest plot of task-specific interventions vs. active control group on the effect size for the sit and reach tests in the forward direction for studies evaluating sitting balance.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A forest plot of task-specific interventions vs. inactive control group on the effect size for the sit and reach tests in the forward direction for studies evaluating sitting balance.
Figure 4
Figure 4
A forest plot evaluating kayak interventions for AP displacement of the CoP in pre-post trials.
Figure 5
Figure 5
A forest plot of task-specific interventions vs. active control group on the effect size for studies evaluating functional standing balance using the BBS.
Figure 6
Figure 6
A forest plot of uncontrolled studies using A) virtual reality and B) BWS interventions and their effects on functional standing balance using the BBS.

References

    1. Horak FB, Macpherson JM.. Postural Orientation and Equilibrium. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc; 2011.
    1. Winter DA. Human balance and posture control during standing and walking. Gait Posture 1995;3(4):193–214. doi: 10.1016/0966-6362(96)82849-9 - DOI
    1. Huxham FE, Goldie PA, Patla AE.. Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Aust J Physiother 2001;47(2):89–100. doi: 10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60300-7 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen CL, Yeung KT, Bih LI, Wang CH, Chen MI, Chien JC.. The relationship between sitting stability and functional performance in patients with paraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84(9):1276–81. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(03)00200-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolpaw JR, Tennissen AM.. Activity-dependent spinal cord plasticity in health and disease. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001;24(1):807–43. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.807 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources