Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2017 Jun;9(6):1725-1729.
doi: 10.21037/jtd.2017.05.34.

A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons

Affiliations
Editorial

A general introduction to adjustment for multiple comparisons

Shi-Yi Chen et al. J Thorac Dis. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

In experimental research a scientific conclusion is always drawn from the statistical testing of hypothesis, in which an acceptable cutoff of probability, such as 0.05 or 0.01, is used for decision-making. However, the probability of committing false statistical inferences would considerably increase when more than one hypothesis is simultaneously tested (namely the multiple comparisons), which therefore requires proper adjustment. Although the adjustment for multiple comparisons is proposed to be mandatory in some journals, it still remains difficult to select a proper method suitable for the various experimental properties and study purposes, especially for researchers without good background in statistics. In the present paper, we provide a brief review on mathematical framework, general concepts and common methods of adjustment for multiple comparisons, which is expected to facilitate the understanding and selection of adjustment methods.

Keywords: Multiple comparisons; adjustment; statistical inference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The increased error rate of multiple comparisons.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Differences of the adjusted P values among various methods. The dashed horizontal line denotes the pre-specified significance level.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic illustration for Holm adjustment.

References

    1. Hsu JC. Multiple comparisons: theory and methods. London: Chapman & Hall: CRC Press, 1996.
    1. Bender R, Lange S. Adjusting for multiple testing—when and how? J Clin Epidemiol 2001;54:343-9. 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00314-0 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thiese MS, Ronna B, Ott U. P value interpretations and considerations. J Thorac Dis 2016;8:E928-E931. 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.16 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Farcomeni A. A review of modern multiple hypothesis testing, with particular attention to the false discovery proportion. Stat Methods Med Res 2008;17:347-88. 10.1177/0962280206079046 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Multiple significance tests: the Bonferroni method. BMJ 1995;310:170. 10.1136/bmj.310.6973.170 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources