Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 25;7(7):e1182.
doi: 10.1038/tp.2017.151.

The DCDC2 deletion is not a risk factor for dyslexia

Affiliations

The DCDC2 deletion is not a risk factor for dyslexia

T S Scerri et al. Transl Psychiatry. .

Abstract

Dyslexia is a specific impairment in learning to read and has strong heritability. An intronic deletion within the DCDC2 gene, with ~8% frequency in European populations, is increasingly used as a marker for dyslexia in neuroimaging and behavioral studies. At a mechanistic level, this deletion has been proposed to influence sensory processing capacity, and in particular sensitivity to visual coherent motion. Our re-assessment of the literature, however, did not reveal strong support for a role of this specific deletion in dyslexia. We also analyzed data from five distinct cohorts, enriched for individuals with dyslexia, and did not identify any signal indicative of associations for the DCDC2 deletion with reading-related measures, including in a combined sample analysis (N=526). We believe we conducted the first replication analysis for a proposed deletion effect on visual motion perception and found no association (N=445 siblings). We also report that the DCDC2 deletion has a frequency of 37.6% in a cohort representative of the general population recruited in Hong Kong (N=220). This figure, together with a lack of association between the deletion and reading abilities in this cohort, indicates the low likelihood of a direct deletion effect on reading skills. Therefore, on the basis of multiple strands of evidence, we conclude that the DCDC2 deletion is not a strong risk factor for dyslexia. Our analyses and literature re-evaluation are important for interpreting current developments within multidisciplinary studies of dyslexia and, more generally, contribute to current discussions about the importance of reproducibility in science.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Katusic SK, Colligan RC, Barbaresi WJ, Schaid DJ, Jacobsen SJ. Incidence of Reading Disability in a Population-Based Birth Cohort, 1976–1982, Rochester, Minn. Mayo Clin Proc 2001; 76: 1081–1092. - PubMed
    1. Chan DW, Ho CS, Tsang S, Lee S, Chung KKH. Prevalence, gender ratio and gender differences in reading‐related cognitive abilities among Chinese children with dyslexia in Hong Kong. Educ Stud 2007; 33: 249–265.
    1. Paracchini S, Diaz R, Stein J. Chapter two – advances in dyslexia genetics—new insights into the role of brain asymmetries. Adv Genet 2016; 96: 53–97. - PubMed
    1. Meng H, Smith SD, Hager K, Held M, Liu J, Olson RK et al. DCDC2 is associated with reading disability and modulates neuronal development in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102: 17053–17058. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Couto JM, Gomez L, Wigg K, Ickowicz A, Pathare T, Malone M et al. Association of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with a candidate region for reading disabilities on chromosome 6p. Biol Psychiatry 2009; 66: 368–375. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances