Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec 1;42(23):E1357-E1365.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002347.

Concurrent Validity and Responsiveness of PROMIS Health Domains Among Patients Presenting for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Affiliations

Concurrent Validity and Responsiveness of PROMIS Health Domains Among Patients Presenting for Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery

Taylor E Purvis et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Prospective cohort study.

Objective: The aim of this study was to determine the validity and responsiveness of Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) health domains.

Summary of background data: PROMIS health domains (anxiety, depression, fatigue, pain, physical function, satisfaction with participation in social roles, sleep disturbance) may measure quality of care and determine minimal important differences (MIDs) after spine surgery. We examined concurrent validity of PROMIS domains before and PROMIS domain MIDs after anterior cervical spine surgery.

Methods: We included 148 adults undergoing cervical spine surgery from February 2015 through June 2016. We determined concurrent validity by correlations of preoperative PROMIS domains with legacy measures and responsiveness of PROMIS domains using distribution-based and anchor-based criteria (preoperative to postoperative change, within 6 months) anchored to treatment expectations (assessed using North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Index criteria). Statistical significance was accepted as P < 0.05.

Results: All PROMIS domains showed moderate to strong correlations with Neck Disability Index, Short-Form Health Survey, version 2 (SF-12v2), and Brief Pain Inventory pain interference and weak correlations with intensity of arm/neck pain (except between PROMIS pain and neck pain [r = 0.45, P < 0.001] and PROMIS physical function and SF-12v2 physical [r = -0.14, P = 0.138] and mental [r = 0.39, P < 0.001] components). PROMIS domains were well correlated with Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 and Patient Health Questionnaire-8 except PROMIS physical function (r = -0.29, P = 0.002). Distribution-based PROMIS MID estimates ranged from 2.3 to 3.9 points. Incorporating cross-sectional and longitudinal anchor-based criteria, final PROMIS MID estimates were as follows: anxiety, -5.7; depression, -4.6, fatigue, -5.8; pain, -5.2; physical function, 4.5; satisfaction with participation in social roles, 4.4; and sleep disturbance, -7.4.

Conclusion: PROMIS domains are a valid assessment of health in this population and were responsive to postoperative improvements in symptoms and quality of life.

Level of evidence: 2.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cella D, Riley W, Stone A, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) developed and tested its first wave of adult self-reported health outcome item banks: 2005–2008. J Clin Epidemiol 2010; 63:1179–1194.
    1. Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS): progress of an NIH Roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care 2007; 45:S3–S11.
    1. Kroenke K, Yu Z, Wu J, et al. Operating characteristics of PROMIS four-item depression and anxiety scales in primary care patients with chronic pain. Pain Med 2014; 15:1892–1901.
    1. Kim J, Chung H, Askew RL, et al. Translating CESD-20 and PHQ-9 Scores to PROMIS Depression. Assessment 2017; 24:300–307.
    1. Schunemann HJ, Guyatt GH. Commentary—goodbye M(C)ID! Hello MID, where do you come from? Health Serv Res 2005; 40:593–597.

Publication types