Fruit and Vegetable Preferences and Identification by Kindergarteners through 2nd-Graders With or Without the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program
- PMID: 28743438
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2017.05.349
Fruit and Vegetable Preferences and Identification by Kindergarteners through 2nd-Graders With or Without the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program
Abstract
Objective: The US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program (FFVP) allows schools to increase fruit and vegetable (FV) exposure by distributing FV as snacks. The objective of this study was to compare kindergarten through second (K-2nd)-graders who were exposed or not to FFVP for preferences and identification.
Design, setting, participants: The FV Preference Survey for K-2nd-graders contained 12 fruits and 12 vegetables, a 3-Likert scale (liked it, okay, don't like it), and an I don't know option. Data were collected from K-2nd-graders at 2 elementary schools near Chicago, IL (n = 435, FFVP school, n = 235 with 12 teachers; non-FFVP school, n = 200 with 10 teachers).
Main outcome measure(s): Mean preference scores.
Analysis: Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, and multiple linear regression analyses compared school data (P < .05).
Results: There were significant differences in mean preference scores, with higher fruit scores at the FFVP school (1.8 ± 0.6) than at the non-FFVP school (1.7 ± 0.6). In contrast, there was a higher vegetable score for the non-FFVP school (1.3 ± 0.9) than for the FFVP school (1.2 ± 0.9). The school variable had weak impact on fruit ranking (multivariate coefficient = 0.01; P < .05). For fruits and vegetables and combined, there were fewer I don't know responses in the FFVP (χ2 = 149.080; P < .01).
Conclusions and implications: At the FFVP school, fewer I don't know responses suggested better FV identification. Non-FFVP students had higher vegetable preferences than did FFVP students. Tasting a variety of FV may help with identifying FV, but more research is needed to determine the impact on preferences.
Keywords: child; fruits; preferences; school; survey; vegetables.
Copyright © 2017 Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program and Requests for Fruits and Vegetables Outside School Settings.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018 Aug;118(8):1408-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2017.10.013. Epub 2018 Jan 8. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2018. PMID: 29325891
-
Increasing Child Fruit and Vegetable Intake: Findings from the US Department of Agriculture Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015 Aug;115(8):1283-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2014.12.026. Epub 2015 Mar 3. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2015. PMID: 25746429
-
Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program participation in elementary schools in the United States and availability of fruits and vegetables in school lunch meals.J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012 Jun;112(6):921-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2012.02.025. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2012. PMID: 22709817
-
Techniques for Advertising Healthy Food in School Settings to Increase Fruit and Vegetable Consumption.Inquiry. 2022 Jan-Dec;59:469580221100165. doi: 10.1177/00469580221100165. Inquiry. 2022. PMID: 35511550 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcome evaluation of fruits and vegetables distribution interventions in schools: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Public Health Nutr. 2021 Oct;24(14):4693-4705. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001683. Epub 2021 Apr 19. Public Health Nutr. 2021. PMID: 33866997 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Three-Year School-Based Multicomponent Intervention May Change Fruit and Vegetable Preferences in Primary School Children-A Quasi-Randomized Trial.Nutrients. 2023 Aug 8;15(16):3505. doi: 10.3390/nu15163505. Nutrients. 2023. PMID: 37630695 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Agent-based modeling insights into the optimal distribution of the Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Program.Prev Med Rep. 2020 Aug 9;20:101173. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101173. eCollection 2020 Dec. Prev Med Rep. 2020. PMID: 32923315 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources