Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 May;15(5):257-264.

Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review

Affiliations
Free PMC article
Review

Revealing the secret life of pre-implantation embryos by time-lapse monitoring: A review

Azita Faramarzi et al. Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 May.
Free PMC article

Abstract

High implantation success following in vitro fertilization cycles are achieved via the transfer of embryos with the highest developmental competence. Multiple pregnancies as a result of the transfer of several embryos per cycle accompany with various complication. Thus, single-embryo transfer (SET) is the preferred practice in assisted reproductive technique (ART) treatment. In order to improve the pregnancy rate for SET, embryologists need reliable biomarkers to aid their selection of embryos with the highest developmental potential. Time-lapse technology is a noninvasive alternative conventional microscopic assessment. It provides uninterrupted and continues the survey of embryo development to transfer day. Today, there are four time-lapse systems that are commercially available for ART centers. In world and Iran, the first time lapse babies were born in 2010 and 2015, respectively, conceived by SET. Here, we review the use of time-lapse monitoring in the observation of embryogenesis as well as its role in SET. Although, the findings from our review support common use of time-lapse monitoring in ART centers; but, future large studies assessing this system in well-designed trials are necessary.

Keywords: Assisted reproductive technology; Embryo selection; Kinetic; Time-lapse.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interests of each author.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2105;32:1025–1030. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Faramarzi A, Khalili MA, Ashourzadeh S. Oocyte morphology and embryo morphokinetics in ICSI program: is there a relationship? Zygote. 2017;25:190–196. - PubMed
    1. Meldrum DR. Introduction: nongenetic markers of oocyte and embryo competence. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:301–302. - PubMed
    1. Massip A, Mulnard J. Time-lapse cinematographic analysis of hatching of normal and frozen-thawed cow blastocysts. J Reprod Fertil. 1980;58:475–478. - PubMed
    1. Massip A, Mulnard J, Vanderzwalmen P, Hanzen C, Ectors F. The behaviour of cow blastocyst in vitro: cinematographic and morphometric analysis. J Anat. 1982;134:399–405. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources