Fog Computing and Edge Computing Architectures for Processing Data From Diabetes Devices Connected to the Medical Internet of Things
- PMID: 28745086
- PMCID: PMC5588847
- DOI: 10.1177/1932296817717007
Fog Computing and Edge Computing Architectures for Processing Data From Diabetes Devices Connected to the Medical Internet of Things
Abstract
The Internet of Things (IoT) is generating an immense volume of data. With cloud computing, medical sensor and actuator data can be stored and analyzed remotely by distributed servers. The results can then be delivered via the Internet. The number of devices in IoT includes such wireless diabetes devices as blood glucose monitors, continuous glucose monitors, insulin pens, insulin pumps, and closed-loop systems. The cloud model for data storage and analysis is increasingly unable to process the data avalanche, and processing is being pushed out to the edge of the network closer to where the data-generating devices are. Fog computing and edge computing are two architectures for data handling that can offload data from the cloud, process it nearby the patient, and transmit information machine-to-machine or machine-to-human in milliseconds or seconds. Sensor data can be processed near the sensing and actuating devices with fog computing (with local nodes) and with edge computing (within the sensing devices). Compared to cloud computing, fog computing and edge computing offer five advantages: (1) greater data transmission speed, (2) less dependence on limited bandwidths, (3) greater privacy and security, (4) greater control over data generated in foreign countries where laws may limit use or permit unwanted governmental access, and (5) lower costs because more sensor-derived data are used locally and less data are transmitted remotely. Connected diabetes devices almost all use fog computing or edge computing because diabetes patients require a very rapid response to sensor input and cannot tolerate delays for cloud computing.
Keywords: Internet of Things; IoT; actuators; cloud computing; edge computing; fog computing; sensors; wireless.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures

Similar articles
-
A Practical Evaluation on RSA and ECC-Based Cipher Suites for IoT High-Security Energy-Efficient Fog and Mist Computing Devices.Sensors (Basel). 2018 Nov 10;18(11):3868. doi: 10.3390/s18113868. Sensors (Basel). 2018. PMID: 30423831 Free PMC article.
-
Actuator behaviour modelling in IoT-Fog-Cloud simulation.PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021 Jul 30;7:e651. doi: 10.7717/peerj-cs.651. eCollection 2021. PeerJ Comput Sci. 2021. PMID: 34401476 Free PMC article.
-
Remote Pain Monitoring Using Fog Computing for e-Healthcare: An Efficient Architecture.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 18;20(22):6574. doi: 10.3390/s20226574. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33217896 Free PMC article.
-
Edge-Computing Architectures for Internet of Things Applications: A Survey.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 11;20(22):6441. doi: 10.3390/s20226441. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 33187267 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Survey of Context-Aware Access Control Mechanisms for Cloud and Fog Networks: Taxonomy and Open Research Issues.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Apr 27;20(9):2464. doi: 10.3390/s20092464. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32349242 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Secure Patient Authentication Framework in the Healthcare System Using Wireless Medical Sensor Networks.J Healthc Eng. 2021 Jul 22;2021:9954089. doi: 10.1155/2021/9954089. eCollection 2021. J Healthc Eng. 2021. PMID: 34336174 Free PMC article.
-
Advancing the State of the Fog Computing to Enable 5G Network Technologies.Sensors (Basel). 2020 Mar 21;20(6):1754. doi: 10.3390/s20061754. Sensors (Basel). 2020. PMID: 32245261 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Nanosystems, Edge Computing, and the Next Generation Computing Systems.Sensors (Basel). 2019 Sep 19;19(18):4048. doi: 10.3390/s19184048. Sensors (Basel). 2019. PMID: 31546907 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Transformative Role of Artificial Intelligence in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: Challenges and Opportunities.J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2698. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082698. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40283528 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Biomedical IoT: Enabling Technologies, Architectural Elements, Challenges, and Future Directions.IEEE Access. 2022;10:31306-31339. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3159235. Epub 2022 Mar 14. IEEE Access. 2022. PMID: 35441062 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Regalado A. Who coined “cloud computing”? 2011. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/425970/who-coined-cloud-computing/. Accessed March 3, 2017.
-
- Cisco. Cisco global cloud index: forecast and methodology, 2015-2020. Available at: http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/solutions/collateral/service-provider/g.... Accessed March 3, 2017.
-
- Cisco. Fog computing and the Internet of things: extend the cloud to where the things are. Available at: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/trends/iot/docs/computing-ov.... Accessed March 3, 2017.
-
- Kempe S. The future of cloud computing: fog computing and the Internet of things. 2015. Available at: http://www.dataversity.net/the-future-of-cloud-computing-fog-computing-a.... Accessed March 3, 2017.
-
- Luan TH, Gao L, Li Z, Xiang Y, We G, Sun L. Fog computing: focusing on mobile users at the edge. 2016. Available at: https://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.01815.pdf. Accessed March 3, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical