Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;92(8):1133-1137.
doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001484.

Using Organizational Philosophy to Create a Self-Sustaining Compensation Plan Without Harming Academic Missions

Affiliations

Using Organizational Philosophy to Create a Self-Sustaining Compensation Plan Without Harming Academic Missions

Robert Leverence et al. Acad Med. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Problem: Academic physician reimbursement has moved to productivity-based compensation plans. To be sustainable, such plans must be self-funding. Additionally, unless research and education are appropriately valued, faculty involved in these efforts will become disillusioned, yet revenue generation in these activities is less robust than for clinical care activities.

Approach: Faculty at the Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, elected a committee of junior and senior faculty and division chiefs to restructure the compensation plan in fiscal year (FY) 2011. This committee was charged with designing a new compensation plan based on seven principles of organizational philosophy: equity, compensation coupled to productivity, authority aligned with responsibility, respect for all academic missions, transparency, professionalism, and self-funding in each academic mission.

Outcomes: The new compensation plan was implemented in FY2013. A survey administered at the end of FY2015 showed that 61% (76/125) of faculty were more satisfied with this plan than the previous plan. Since the year before implementation, clinical relative value units per faculty increased 7% (from 3,458 in FY2012 to 3,704 in FY2015, P < .002), incentives paid per faculty increased 250% (from $3,191 in FY2012 to $11,153 in FY2015, P ≤ .001), and publications per faculty increased 15% (from 2.6 in FY2012 to 3.0 in FY2015, P < .001). Grant submissions, external funding, and teaching hours also increased per faculty but did not reach statistical significance.

Next steps: An important next step will be to incorporate quality metrics into the compensation plan, without affecting costs or throughput.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total and normalized for faculty number clinical relative value units (RVUs) for the year prior to (fiscal year [FY] 2012) and three years after implementation (FY2013–FY2015) of the Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, compensation plan. Asterisk indicates P < .002.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Total and normalized for faculty number external research funding for the year prior to (fiscal year [FY] 2012) and three years after implementation (FY2013–FY2015) of the Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, compensation plan (not significant).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Total and normalized for faculty number publications for the year prior to (fiscal year [FY] 2012) and three years after implementation (FY2013–FY2015) of the Department of Medicine, University of Florida Health, compensation plan. Asterisk indicates P < .001.

References

    1. Kairouz VF, Raad D, Fudyma J, Curtis AB, Schünemann HJ, Akl EA. Assessment of faculty productivity in academic departments of medicine in the United States: A national survey. BMC Med Educ. 2014;14:205. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miller RD, Cohen NH. The impact of productivity-based incentives on faculty salary-based compensation. Anesth Analg. 2005;101:195–199.. - PubMed
    1. Reece EA, Nugent O, Wheeler RP, Smith CW, Hough AJ, Winter C. Adapting industry-style business model to academia in a system of performance-based incentive compensation. Acad Med. 2008;83:76–84.. - PubMed
    1. Akl EA, Meerpohl JJ, Raad D, et al. Effects of assessing the productivity of faculty in academic medical centres: A systematic review. CMAJ. 2012;184:E602–E612.. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mets B, Eckerd K. Faculty incentive plans: Clinical or academic productivity or both? Anesth Analg. 2006;102:968–969.. - PubMed