Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 24:11:40.
doi: 10.1186/s13034-017-0177-0. eCollection 2017.

Adolescent adaptive behavior profiles in Williams-Beuren syndrome, Down syndrome, and autism spectrum disorder

Carolina Grego Del Cole  1   2 , Sheila Cavalcante Caetano  2 , Wagner Ribeiro  3 , Arthur Melo E E Kümmer  4 , Andrea Parolin Jackowski  1
Affiliations

Adolescent adaptive behavior profiles in Williams-Beuren syndrome, Down syndrome, and autism spectrum disorder

Carolina Grego Del Cole et al. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. .

Abstract

Background: Adaptive behavior can be impaired in different neurodevelopmental disorders and may be influenced by confounding factors, such as intelligence quotient (IQ) and socioeconomic classification. Our main objective was to verify whether adaptive behavior profiles differ in three conditions-Williams Beuren syndrome (WBS), Down syndrome (DS), and autism spectrum disorder (ASD), as compared with healthy controls (HC) and with each other. Although the literature points towards each disorder having a characteristic profile, no study has compared profiles to establish the specificity of each one. A secondary objective was to explore potential interactions between the conditions and socioeconomic status, and whether this had any effect on adaptive behavior profiles.

Methods: One hundred and five adolescents were included in the study. All adolescents underwent the following evaluations: the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scale (VABS), the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC), and the Brazilian Economic Classification Criteria.

Results: Our results demonstrated that the WBS group performed better than the DS group in the communication domain, β = -15.08, t(3.45), p = .005, and better than the ASD group in the socialization domain, β = 8.92, t(-2.08), p = .013. The DS group also performed better than the ASD group in socialization, β = 16.98, t(-2.32), p = .024. IQ was an important confounding factor, and socioeconomic status had an important effect on the adaptive behavior of all groups.

Conclusions: There is a heterogeneity regarding adaptive behavior profiles in WBS, DS, and ASD. These data are important to better design specific strategies related to the health and social care of each particular group.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Schalock RL, Borthwick-Duffy SA, Bradley VJ, Buntinx WH, Coulter DL, et al. Intellectual disability: definition, classification and systems of supports. 11th ed. Washington, DC: American association on intellectual and developmental disabilities; 2010.
    1. Sparrow SS, Balla DA, Cicchetti DV. Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales. Circle Pines: American Guidance Service; 1984.
    1. Burns MK. Test review of the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System. 2nd ed. In: Spies RA, Plake BS (eds.). The sixteenth mental measurement yearbook. New York: Springer; 2005.
    1. Maccow G. Test review of the Scales of Independent Behavior—revised. In: Plake BS, Impara JC. The fourteenth mental measurements yearbook. New York: Oxford University Press; 2001. http://www.unl.edu/buros. Accessed 2 Aug 2015.
    1. Angold A, Costello E. A review of the issues relevant to the creation of a measure of disability in children based on the World Health Organization’s international classification of functioning and disability (ICIDH-2). Prepared for the World Health Organization; 2000.

LinkOut - more resources