Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May 5;5(4):881-888.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.471. eCollection 2017 Jul.

Allergens labeling on French processed foods - an Oqali study

Affiliations

Allergens labeling on French processed foods - an Oqali study

Charlène Battisti et al. Food Sci Nutr. .

Abstract

The French Observatory of Food Quality (Oqali) aims at collecting all nutritional data provided on labels of processed foods (nutritional information and composition), at branded products level, in order to follow nutritional labeling changes over time. This study carries out an overview of allergens labeling frequencies by distinguishing allergens used in recipes from those listed on precautionary statements, for the fourteen allergen categories for which labeling is mandatory according to European legislation. 17,309 products were collected, between 2008 and 2012, from 26 food categories. Products were classified per family and type of brand (national brands, retailer brands, entry-level retailer brands, hard discount, and specialized retailer brands). Allergenic ingredients were identified from ingredients lists and precautionary statements. 73% of the 17,309 products studied contained at least one allergen in their ingredients list and 39% had a precautionary statement for one or more allergens. Milk (53%), gluten (41%), and egg (22%) were the most commonly used allergens in ingredients lists. For precautionary statement, nuts (20%), egg (14%), peanut (13%), soybean (12%), and milk (11%) were the most common allergens listed. Precautionary statement was most frequently found among first-price products (hard discount and entry-level retailer brands). National brands seemed to use it less frequently. For all these results, differences depended both on food categories and allergen categories. This study will enable to follow allergens labeling and their use as ingredients over time, particularly by assessing an hypothetical increase in allergens presence in processed food.

Keywords: Allergen; allergen‐free claims; food allergy; labeling; precautionary statement; processed foods; types of brands.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. AFSSA . (2008). Allergies alimentaires et étiquetage de précaution. Retrieved from https://www.anses.fr/fr/system/files/NUT-Ra-AllergiesEtiquetage.pdf
    1. AFSSA et Ministère de la santé de la famille et des personnes handicapées . (2002). Allergies alimentaires: Connaissances, clinique et prévention. Retrieved from http://social-sante.gouv.fr/IMG/pdf/actions42_allergies.pdf
    1. ANIA . (2005). Guide des bonnes pratiques pour la réduction des présences fortuites d'allergènes majeurs.
    1. Bock, S. A. , Muñoz‐Furlong, A. , & Sampson, H. A. (2007). Further fatalities caused by anaphylactic reactions to food, 2001‐2006. The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 119, 1016–1018. - PubMed
    1. Commission . (2006). Commission directive 2006/125/EC of 5 December 2006 on processed cereal‐based foods and baby foods for infants and young children, 2006/125/CE C.F.R.

LinkOut - more resources