Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun 20;5(4):896-903.
doi: 10.1002/fsn3.473. eCollection 2017 Jul.

Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulses

Matthew G Nosworthy  1 , Jason Neufeld  1 , Peter Frohlich  2 , Gina Young  2 , Linda Malcolmson  2 , James D House  1   3   4   5   6
Affiliations

Determination of the protein quality of cooked Canadian pulses

Matthew G Nosworthy et al. Food Sci Nutr. .

Abstract

A study to determine the protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score and protein efficiency ratio of nine different cooked Canadian pulse classes was conducted in support of the establishment of protein quality claims in Canada and the United States. Split green and yellow pea, whole green lentil, split red lentil, Kabuli chickpea, navy bean, pinto bean, light red kidney bean, and black bean were investigated. Protein digestibility-corrected amino acid score (PDCAAS) and the protein efficiency ratio (PER) were determined using the appropriate rodent models. All pulses had high digestibility values, >70%, with PDCAAS values greater than 0.5, thereby qualifying as a quality protein in the United States, but only navy beans qualified as a good source of protein. All pulses except whole green lentils, split red lentils, and split green peas would qualify as sources of protein with protein ratings between 20 and 30.4 in Canada. These findings support the use of pulses as protein sources in the regulatory context of both the United States and Canada.

Keywords: digestible indispensable amino acid score; protein digestibility‐corrected amino acid score; protein efficiency ratio; pulses.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Akibode, S. , & Maredia, M . (2012). Global and regional trends in production, trade and consumption of food legume crops. Retrieved from http://impact.cgiar.org/sites/default/files/images/Legumetrendsv2.pdf
    1. Alajaji, S. A. , & El‐Adawy, T. A. (2006). Nutritional composition of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) as affected by microwave cooking and other traditional cooking methods. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis, 19, 806–812.
    1. AOAC International . (1995). Official methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 16th Edition. Arlington VA: AOAC International.
    1. Bhatty, R. S. , Christison, G. I. , & Centre, C. D. (1984). Laboratory analysis Proximate composition of the three meals, protein concentrates and isolates. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition, 34, 41–51.
    1. Candela, M. , Astiasaran, I. , & Belli, J. (1997). Cooking and warm‐holding: Effect on general composition and amino acids of kidney beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), chickpeas (Cicer arietinum), and lentils (Lens culinaris). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 45, 4763–4767.

LinkOut - more resources