Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 26;7(7):e014290.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014290.

Herbal medications for surgical patients: a systematic review protocol

Affiliations

Herbal medications for surgical patients: a systematic review protocol

Ana Paula Nappi Arruda et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Introduction: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) affect approximately 80% of surgical patients and is associated with increased length of hospital stay and systemic costs. Preoperative and postoperative pain, anxiety and depression are also commonly reported. Recent evidence regarding their safety and effectiveness has not been synthesised. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of herbal medications for the treatment and prevention of anxiety, depression, pain and PONV in patients undergoing laparoscopic, obstetrical/gynaecological and cardiovascular surgical procedures.

Methods and analysis: The following electronic databases will be searched up to 1 October 2016 without language or publication status restrictions: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Web of Science and LILACS. Randomised clinical trials enrolling adult surgical patients undergoing laparoscopic, obstetrical/gynaecological and cardiovascular surgeries and managed with herbal medication versus a control group (placebo, no intervention or active control) prophylactically or therapeutically will be considered eligible. Outcomes of interest will include the following: anxiety, depression, pain, nausea and vomiting. A team of reviewers will complete title and abstract screening and full-text screening for identified hits independently and in duplicate. Data extraction, risk of bias assessments and evaluation of the overall quality of evidence for each relevant outcome reported will be conducted independently and in duplicate using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment Development and Evaluation classification system. Dichotomous data will be summarised as risk ratios; continuous data will be summarised as standard average differences with 95% CIs.

Ethics and dissemination: This is one of the first efforts to systematically summarise existing evidence evaluating the use of herbal medications in laparoscopic, obstetrical/gynaecological and cardiovascular surgical patients. The findings of this review will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Systematic review registration: PROSPERO CRD42016042838.

Keywords: GRADE; cardiac surgery; gynecologic surgery; herbal; laparoscopy; obstetrical surgery; systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kable AK, Gibberd RW, Spigelman AD. Adverse events in surgical patients in Australia. Int J Qual Health Care 2002;14:269–76. 10.1093/intqhc/14.4.269 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Farhadi K, Choubsaz M, Setayeshi K, et al. . The effectiveness of dry-cupping in preventing post-operative nausea and vomiting by P6 acupoint stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Medicine 2016;95:e4770 10.1097/MD.0000000000004770 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Youssef N, Orlov D, Alie T, et al. . What epidural opioid results in the best analgesia outcomes and fewest side effects after surgery?: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Anesth Analg 2014;119:965–77. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000377 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palazzo MG, Strunin L. Anaesthesia and emesis. I: Etiology. Can Anaesth Soc J 1984;31:178–87. 10.1007/BF03015257 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gan TJ, Diemunsch P, Habib AS, et al. . Consensus guidelines for the management of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 2014;118:85–113. 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000002 - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources