Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 May;19(Suppl D):D102-D112.
doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/sux027. Epub 2017 May 2.

ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC Consensus Document: biomarkers in heart failure

Affiliations

ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC Consensus Document: biomarkers in heart failure

Nadia Aspromonte et al. Eur Heart J Suppl. 2017 May.

Abstract

Biomarkers have dramatically impacted the way heart failure (HF) patients are evaluated and managed. A biomarker is a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological or pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. Natriuretic peptides [B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal proBNP] are the gold standard biomarkers in determining the diagnosis and prognosis of HF, and a natriuretic peptide-guided HF management looks promising. In the last few years, an array of additional biomarkers has emerged, each reflecting different pathophysiological processes in the development and progression of HF: myocardial insult, inflammation, fibrosis, and remodelling, but their role in the clinical care of the patient is still partially defined and more studies are needed before to be well validated. Moreover, several new biomarkers have the potential to identify patients with early renal dysfunction and appear to have promise to help the management cardio-renal syndrome. With different biomarkers reflecting HF presence, the various pathways involved in its progression, as well as identifying unique treatment options for HF management, a closer cardiologist-laboratory link, with a multi-biomarker approach to the HF patient, is not far ahead, allowing the unique opportunity for specifically tailoring care to the individual pathological phenotype.

Keywords: Biomarkers; Fibrosis; Galectin 3; Heart failure; Inflammation; Natriuretic peptides; Troponin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aspromonte N, Gulizia MM, Clerico A, Di Tano G, Emdin M, Feola M, Iacoviello M, Latini R, Mortara A, Valle R, Misuraca G, Passino C, Masson S, Aimo A, Ciaccio M, Migliardi M. [ANMCO/ELAS/SIBioC Consensus document: Recommendations for the use of cardiac biomarkers in heart failure patients]. G Ital Cardiol 2016;17:615–656. - PubMed
    1. Clerico A, Passino C, Franzini M, Emdin M.. Cardiac biomarker testing in the clinical laboratory: where do we stand? General overview of the methodology with special emphasis on natriuretic peptides. Clin Chim Acta 2015;443:17–24. - PubMed
    1. Prontera C, Zaninotto M, Giovannini S, Zucchelli GC, Pilo A, Sciacovelli L, Plebani M, Clerico A. Proficiency testing project for brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) and the N-terminal part of the propeptide of BNP (NT-proBNP) immunoassays: the CardioOrmocheck study. Clin Chem Lab Med 2009;47:762–768. - PubMed
    1. Clerico A, Ripoli A, Masotti S, Prontera C, Storti S, Fortunato A, Buzzi P, Casagranda I, Franzini M, Ndreu R, Zucchelli GC, Zaninotto M, Plebani M. Pilot study on harmonization of cardiac troponin I immunoassays using patients and quality control plasma samples. On behalf of the Italian Section of the European Ligand Assay Society (ELAS) and of the Study Group on Cardiovascular Biomarkers of the Società Italiana di Biochimica Clinica (SIBioC). Clin Chem Acta 2016;456:42–48. - PubMed
    1. Cohen D. Rivaroxaban: can we trust the evidence? BMJ. 2016;352:i575. - PubMed