Changing Definitions of Sepsis
- PMID: 28752002
- PMCID: PMC5512390
- DOI: 10.5152/TJAR.2017.93753
Changing Definitions of Sepsis
Abstract
Sepsis is one of the main causes of morbidity and mortality in critically ill patients despite the use of modern antibiotics and resuscitation therapies. Outcomes in sepsis have improved overall, probably because of an enhanced focus on early diagnosis and other improvements in supportive care, but mortality rates still remain unacceptably high. The diagnosis and definition of sepsis is a critical problem due to the heterogeneity of this disease process. Although it is apparent that much more needs to be done to advance our understanding, sepsis and related terms remain difficult to define. A 1991 consensus conference developed initial definitions that systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) to infection would be called sepsis. Definitions of sepsis and septic shock were revised in 2001 to incorporate the threshold values for organ damage. In early 2016, the new definitions of sepsis and septic shock have changed dramatically. Sepsis is now defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. The consensus document describes organ dysfunction as an acute increase in total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score two points consequently to the infection. A significant change in the new definitions is the elimination of any mention of SIRS. The Sepsis-3 Task Force also introduced a new bedside index, called the qSOFA, to identify outside of critical care units patients with suspected infection who are likely to develop sepsis. Recently updated the consensus definitions improved specificity compared with the previous descriptions.
Keywords: SIRS; Sepsis; definitions; septic shock.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of Interest: No conflict of interest was declared by the authors.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Assessment of Clinical Criteria for Sepsis: For the Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):762-74. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0288. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26903335 Free PMC article.
-
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287. JAMA. 2016. PMID: 26903338 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of qSOFA and SIRS for predicting adverse outcomes of patients with suspicion of sepsis outside the intensive care unit.Crit Care. 2017 Mar 26;21(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1658-5. Crit Care. 2017. PMID: 28342442 Free PMC article.
-
Low sensitivity of qSOFA, SIRS criteria and sepsis definition to identify infected patients at risk of complication in the prehospital setting and at the emergency department triage.Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017 Nov 3;25(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0449-y. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2017. PMID: 29100549 Free PMC article.
-
International pediatric sepsis consensus conference: definitions for sepsis and organ dysfunction in pediatrics.Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;6(1):2-8. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000149131.72248.E6. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2005. PMID: 15636651 Review.
Cited by
-
Dysregulation of neutrophil death in sepsis.Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 18;13:963955. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.963955. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36059483 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Sepsis Biomarkers: Advancements and Clinical Applications-A Narrative Review.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Aug 19;25(16):9010. doi: 10.3390/ijms25169010. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39201697 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The Role of Exosomes in Inflammatory Diseases and Tumor-Related Inflammation.Cells. 2022 Mar 16;11(6):1005. doi: 10.3390/cells11061005. Cells. 2022. PMID: 35326456 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Anakinra authorized to treat severe coronavirus disease 2019; Sepsis breakthrough or time to reflect?Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 19;14:1250483. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1250483. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37928695 Free PMC article.
-
High Variability in Sepsis Guidelines in UK: Why Does It Matter?Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Mar 19;17(6):2026. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062026. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020. PMID: 32204395 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Martin GS, Mannino DM, Eaton S, Moss M. The epidemiology of sepsis in the United States from 1979 through 2000. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:1546–54. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa022139. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kumar G, Kumar N, Taneja A, Kaleekal T, Tarima S, McGinley, et al. Nationwide trends of severe sepsis in the 21st century (2000–2007) Chest. 2011;140:1223–31. https://doi.org/10.1378/chest.11-0352. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Levy MM, Artigas A, Phillips GS, Rhodes A, Beale R, Osborn T, et al. Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2012;12:919–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(12)70239-6. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaukonen KM, Bailey M, Suzuki S, Pilcher D, Bellomo R. Mortality related to severe sepsis and septic shock among critically ill patients in Australia and New Zealand, 2000–2012. JAMA. 2014;311:1308–16. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.2637. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dellinger RP, Schorr CA, Levy MM. A users’ guide to the 2016 Surviving Sepsis Guidelines. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43:299–303. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources