Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Jul;7(3):e158-e162.
doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1603954. Epub 2017 Jul 25.

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term

Affiliations
Case Reports

Survey of Provider Preferences Regarding the Route of Misoprostol for Induction of Labor at Term

Rachel Towns et al. AJP Rep. 2017 Jul.

Abstract

Objective To survey obstetrical provider preferences regarding use of misoprostol for induction of labor (IOL). Methods An anonymous 25-question survey was distributed at an American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) joint District V and VII Meeting in 2014 to obstetrics providers. The same survey was sent electronically to local providers. A separate survey was emailed to the labor and delivery nurses at two of the teaching hospitals in Indianapolis. The surveys queried provider demographics, dosing practice for misoprostol, opinions regarding different dosing strategies, and instructions on buccal administration. Results A total of 113 (46.5%) providers responded. Of these, 92.9% used misoprostol for IOL, 73% preferred the vaginal route, 20% preferred buccal administration, and 7% oral administration. Only resident physician and midwife providers endorsed buccal route preference. Being a midwife independently predicted a preference for using buccal misoprostol (odds ratio [OR]: 125.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.9-1992.3). Additionally, 44 nurses completed the survey regarding administration techniques of buccal misoprostol. Also, 54.5% of nurses correctly instructed their patients on buccal administration techniques. Conclusion Although not extensively studied, one-fifth of providers, particularly nurse midwives, prefer buccal administration of misoprostol for IOL. The majority of nurses correctly administered buccal misoprostol. There may be a need for further study and education about buccal administration of misoprostol for IOL.

Keywords: buccal; labor induction; misoprostol; provider preference; vaginal.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interests There exists no financial conflict of interests.

References

    1. Osterman M J, Martin J A. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief. 2014;(155):1–8. - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr G J, Gülmezoglu A M, Pileggi C. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(10):CD000941. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins–Obstetrics.ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 107: Induction of labor Obstet Gynecol 2009114(2, Pt 1):386–397. - PubMed
    1. Alfirevic Z, Aflaifel N, Weeks A. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;6(06):CD001338. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Elati A, Weeks A D. The use of misoprostol in obstetrics and gynaecology. BJOG. 2009;116 01:61–69. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources