Interventions Using Social Media for Cancer Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 28753192
- PMCID: PMC5787052
- DOI: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000534
Interventions Using Social Media for Cancer Prevention and Management: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: Regarding cancer awareness, social media effectively promotes health and supports self-management. Given the diverse study designs, methodologies, and approaches of social media interventions in oncology, it is difficult to determine the effects of social media on cancer prevention and management.
Objective: We aim to systematically review intervention studies using social media for cancer care.
Methods: A systematic search, using 7 electronic databases (PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Scopus, EMBASE, and PsycINFO), was conducted to identify surveys and interventions using contemporary social media tools with a focus on cancer.
Results: Of the 18 selected studies, 7 were randomized controlled trials. Most studies were conducted for all types of cancer, and some were conducted for breast cancer in the United States, with mostly white female participants. Facebook was the most frequently used platform. Most studies targeted healthy participants providing cancer prevention education. With social media platforms as part of a larger intervention, or the main component of interventions, interventions were overall feasible and showed a significant improvement in cancer prevention and management.
Conclusions: Social media tools have the potential to be effective in delivering interventions for cancer prevention and management. However, there was a dearth of studies with rigorous study methodologies to test social media effects on various cancer-related clinical outcomes.
Implications for practice: Social media use in cancer care will facilitate improved communication and support among patients, caregivers, and clinicians and, ultimately, improved patient care. Clinicians need to carefully harness social media to enhance patient care and clinical outcomes.
Conflict of interest statement
The author declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Siegel R, Miller K, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(1):7–30. - PubMed
-
- Slev VN, Mistiaen P, Pasman HR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM, van Uden-Kraan CF, Francke AL. Effects of eHealth for patients and informal caregivers confronted with cancer: A meta-review. Int J Med Inform. 2016;87:54–67. - PubMed
-
- Kaplan AM, Haenlein M. Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Busi Horiz. 2010;53(1):59–68.
-
- Karrer T. Forums vs. Social networks? e Learn Tech. 2008 http://elearningtech.blogspot.com/2008/09/forums-vs-social-networks.html. Accessed Jan 16, 2017.
-
- What Is a Virtual World? Virtual Worlds Review Website. http://www.virtualworldsreview.com/info/whatis.shtml. Accessed Jan 17, 2017.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
