Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jul 28;12(7):e0181396.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0181396. eCollection 2017.

Impact of organizational and individual factors on patient-provider relationships: A national survey of doctors, nurses and patients in China

Ping Zhang  1 , Fang Wang  1 , Yao Cheng  1 , Liu Yi Zhang  1 , Bei Zhu Ye  1 , Hong Wei Jiang  1 , Yi Sun  1 , Xi Zhu  2 , Yuan Liang  1
Affiliations

Impact of organizational and individual factors on patient-provider relationships: A national survey of doctors, nurses and patients in China

Ping Zhang et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To provide an empirical examination of patient-provider relationships (PPR) and its association with organizational and individual factors.

Methods: A national cross-sectional survey was conducted by stratified cluster sampling in 77 hospitals across seven provinces in China between July 2014 and April 2015, involving 3621 doctors, 5561 nurses, and 8022 patients with response rates of 62.93%, 61.16%, and 33.08%, respectively. Self-perceived PPR was the outcome variable. Organizational factors included hospital type (western medicine [WM] and traditional Chinese medicine [TCM] hospital); hospital level (tertiary and secondary hospital); area of specialization (internal medicine and surgery); ratio of doctors (nurses) to ward beds; doctors/nurses' concerns about performance assessment; and patients' perceptions of healthcare cost. Individual factors included consultation, listening to patients and socio-demographic factors.

Results: 54.6% of doctors, 36.6% of nurses, and 10.2% of patients perceived PPR as poor. Organizational factors independently associated with providers' perception of poor PPR included hospital type (WM vs TCM: OR = 1.25 [95% CI: 1.06-1.47]) and concerns about performance assessment (high vs low levels: OR = 1.40 [95% CI: 1.14-1.72]) for doctors, and concerns about performance assessment (average vs low levels: OR = 0.79 [95% CI: 0.67-0.93]) for nurses. Those associated with patients' perception of poor PPR included hospital type (WM vs TCM: OR = 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.74]) and hospital level (tertiary vs secondary: OR = 0.65 [95% CI: 0.51-0.82]). Doctors and nurses reporting listening to patients "frequently" had better perceptions of PPR (OR = 0.46 [95%CI: 0.38-0.56] and 0.49 [95% CI: 0.41-0.59] for doctors and nurses, respectively), as did their patients (OR = 0.24 [95% CI: 0.18-0.31] and 0.54 [95% CI: 0.35-0.84] for doctors and nurses, respectively).

Conclusions: Although our findings require validation in different organizational settings given the likely variability of these associations across systems, our results suggest that implementing moderate levels promoting the level of medical treatment, and broadening doctors/nurses training regarding listening to patients, may benefit to enhance PPR.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Flowchart for recruitment and response rates of the participants.
WM, Western Medicine. TCM, Traditional Chinese Medicine. TH, Tertiary Hospital. SH, Secondary Hospital.
Fig 2
Fig 2. The proportion of the perception of PPR of doctors, nurses and patients.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Berger D. Corruption ruins the doctor-patient relationship in India. BMJ. 2014;348: g3169 doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3169 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shay LA, Dumenci L, Siminoff LA, Flocke SA, Lafata JE. Factors associated with patient reports of positive physician relational communication. Patient Educ Couns. 2012; 89: 96–101. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.04.003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thielscher C, Schulte-Sutrum B. Development of the Physician-patient Relationship in Germany during the Last Years from the Perspective of the Heads of Chambers and KVs. Gesundheitswesen. 2016;78(1):8–13. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1384567 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bascuñán R ML. Changes in physician-patient relationship and medical satisfaction. Rev Med Chil. 2005;133(1):11–16. - PubMed
    1. Ceriani Cernadas JM. Is it possible to revert doctor-patient relationship deterioration. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2016;114(4):290–1. - PubMed

MeSH terms