Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node-Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Competing Risks Analysis
- PMID: 28753775
- DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2016.07.001
Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy After Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node-Positive Muscle-invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Competing Risks Analysis
Abstract
Background: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) after radical cystectomy (RC) is controversial.
Objective: To assess the effectiveness of AC after RC for muscle-invasive UCB in contemporary European routine practice.
Design, setting, and participants: By using a prospectively collected European multicenter database, we compared survival outcomes between patients who received AC versus observation after RC for locally advanced (pT3/T4) and/or pelvic lymph node-positive (pN+) muscle-invasive UCB in 2011.
Intervention: AC versus observation after RC.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW)-adjusted Cox regression and competing risks analyses were performed to compare overall survival (OS) as well as cancer-specific and other-cause mortality between patients who received AC versus observation.
Results and limitations: Overall, 224 patients who received AC (n = 84) versus observation (n = 140) were included. The rate of 3-yr OS in patients who received AC versus observation was 62.1% versus 40.9%, respectively (p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted Cox regression analysis, AC versus observation was associated with an OS benefit (hazard ratio: 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-0.86; p = 0.014). In IPTW-adjusted competing risks analysis, AC versus observation was associated with a decreased risk of cancer-specific mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.26-0.98; p = 0.044) without any increased risk of other-cause mortality (subhazard ratio: 0.48; 95% CI: 0.14-1.60; p = 0.233). Limitations include the relatively small sample size as well as the potential presence of unmeasured confounders related to the observational study design.
Conclusions: We found that AC versus observation was associated with a survival benefit after RC in patients with pT3/T4 and/or pN+ UCB. These results should encourage physicians to deliver AC and researchers to pursue prospective or large observational investigations.
Patient summary: Overall survival and cancer-specific survival benefit was found in patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy relative to observation after radical cystectomy for locally advanced and/or pelvic lymph node-positive bladder cancer.
Keywords: Adjuvant chemotherapy; Cystectomy; Propensity score; Survival; Urinary bladder neoplasms.
Copyright © 2016 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Comment in
-
Re: Effectiveness of Adjuvant Chemotherapy after Radical Cystectomy for Locally Advanced and/or Pelvic Lymph Node-Positive Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder: A Propensity Score-Weighted Competing Risks Analysis.J Urol. 2020 Feb;203(2):250. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000638. Epub 2019 Nov 11. J Urol. 2020. PMID: 31710539 No abstract available.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
