Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2018 Feb;27(2):103-109.
doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2016-006312. Epub 2017 Jul 28.

The use of patient feedback by hospital boards of directors: a qualitative study of two NHS hospitals in England

Robert Lee  1 , Juan I Baeza  1 , Naomi J Fulop  2
Affiliations

The use of patient feedback by hospital boards of directors: a qualitative study of two NHS hospitals in England

Robert Lee et al. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Feb.

Abstract

Background: Although previous research suggests that different kinds of patient feedback are used in different ways to help improve the quality of hospital care, there have been no studies of the ways in which hospital boards of directors use feedback for this purpose.

Objectives: To examine whether and how boards of directors of hospitals use feedback from patients to formulate strategy and to assure and improve the quality of care.

Methods: We undertook an in-depth qualitative study in two acute hospital National Health Service foundation trusts in England, purposively selected as contrasting examples of the collection of different kinds of patient feedback. We collected and analysed data from interviews with directors and other managers, from observation of board meetings, and from board papers and other documents.

Results: The two boards used in-depth qualitative feedback and quantitative feedback from surveys in different ways to help develop strategies, set targets for quality improvement and design specific quality improvement initiatives; but both boards made less subsequent use of any kinds of feedback to monitor their strategies or explicitly to assure the quality of services.

Discussion and conclusions: We have identified limitations in the uses of patient feedback by hospital boards that suggest that boards should review their current practice to ensure that they use the different kinds of patient feedback that are available to them more effectively to improve, monitor and assure the quality of care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Comment in

References

    1. Leadership Academy NHS. The Healthy NHS Board. Principles for Good Governance 2013.
    1. Department of Health. Understanding what matters. A Guide to using patient feedback to transform Services. London: Department of Health, 2009.
    1. Department of Health. Hard Truths: The Journey to Putting Patients First. VolumeOne of the Government Response to the Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation TrustPublic Inquiry. Cm 8777-1. London: The Stationery Office Ltd, 2014.
    1. Monitor. Quality Governance Framework. London: Monitor, 2010.
    1. Monitor. Quality Governance: how does a Board Know that its Organisation is working effectively to improve Patient Care? guidance for boards of NHS Provider Organisations. London: Monitor, 2013.