Racial Disparities After Stoma Construction Exist in Time to Closure After 1 Year but Not in Overall Stoma Reversal Rates
- PMID: 28755086
- DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3514-y
Racial Disparities After Stoma Construction Exist in Time to Closure After 1 Year but Not in Overall Stoma Reversal Rates
Abstract
Introduction: Conflicting data exist on racial disparities in stoma reversal (SR) rates. Our aim was to investigate the role of race in SR rates, and time to closure, in a longitudinal, racially diverse database.
Methods: All adult patients (>18 years) who received an ileostomy or colostomy from 1999 to 2016 at a single institution were identified. Primary outcomes were SR rates and time to closure. Failure to reverse and time to closure was modeled using Cox regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves, stratified by race, were generated for time to closure and hazard ratios (HRs) calculated.
Results: Of 770 patients with stomas, 65.6% of patients underwent SR; 76.6% were white and 23.4% were black. On adjusted analysis, race did not predict overall SR rates or time to closure if performed less than 1 year. Instead, significant predictors for failure in SR included age, insurance status, end colostomy/ileostomy, and loop colostomy (p < 0.05). Predictors of delay in time to closure included insurance, end colostomy/ileostomy, and loop colostomy (p < 0.05). In patients who underwent reversal after 1 year, black race was an independent predictor of time to closure (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.07-0.63, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: SR rates were equal between black and white patients. Disparities in time to closure existed only for black patients if reversed more than 1 year after index stoma construction. While equitable outcomes were achieved for most patients, further investigation is necessary to understand stoma disparities after 1 year.
Keywords: Ostomy reversal; Racial disparities; Stomas; Time to closure.
Similar articles
-
Race and socioeconomic disparities in national stoma reversal rates.Am J Surg. 2016 Apr;211(4):710-5. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.11.020. Epub 2016 Jan 6. Am J Surg. 2016. PMID: 26852146
-
Do trauma stomas ever get reversed?J Am Coll Surg. 2014 Jul;219(1):70-77.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2014.02.024. Epub 2014 Mar 13. J Am Coll Surg. 2014. PMID: 24862884
-
Loop transverse colostomy versus loop ileostomy for defunctioning of colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review, updated conventional meta-analysis, and cumulative meta-analysis.Surg Today. 2019 Feb;49(2):108-117. doi: 10.1007/s00595-018-1708-x. Epub 2018 Aug 27. Surg Today. 2019. PMID: 30151626
-
Acute Surgical Decision-Making in Abdominal Trauma Is Not Altered by Race or Socioeconomic Status.Am Surg. 2018 Dec 1;84(12):1869-1875. Am Surg. 2018. PMID: 30606341
-
The influence of diverting loop ileostomy vs. colostomy on postoperative morbidity in restorative anterior resection for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 Mar;404(2):129-139. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01758-1. Epub 2019 Feb 12. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019. PMID: 30747281
Cited by
-
Association of Timing of Colostomy Reversal With Outcomes Following Hartmann Procedure for Diverticulitis.JAMA Surg. 2019 Mar 1;154(3):218-224. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4359. JAMA Surg. 2019. PMID: 30476948 Free PMC article.
-
Socioeconomic disparities in ostomy reversal among older adults with diverticulitis are more substantial among non-Hispanic Black patients.Surgery. 2021 Oct;170(4):1039-1046. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2021.03.050. Epub 2021 Apr 28. Surgery. 2021. PMID: 33933283 Free PMC article.
-
Permanent stoma: a quality outcome in treatment of rectal cancer and its impact on length of stay.BMC Surg. 2021 Mar 25;21(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01166-7. BMC Surg. 2021. PMID: 33765978 Free PMC article.
-
Journey for patients following ileostomy creation is not straightforward.Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019 Dec;34(12):2075-2080. doi: 10.1007/s00384-019-03428-6. Epub 2019 Nov 9. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2019. PMID: 31707557
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials