The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review
- PMID: 28755440
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14839
The effectiveness of surgical interventions for women with FGM/C: a systematic review
Abstract
Background: Female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) changes normal genital functionality and can cause complications. There is an increasing demand for treatment of FGM/C-related complications.
Objectives: We conducted a systematic review of empirical quantitative research on the outcomes of interventions for women with FGM/C-related complications.
Search strategy: A search specialist searched 16 electronic databases.
Selection criteria: Selection was performed independently by two researchers. We accepted quantitative studies that examined the outcome of an intervention for an FGM/C-related concern.
Data collection and analysis: We extracted data into a pre-designed form, calculated effect estimates, and performed meta-analyses.
Main results: We included 62 studies (5829 women), which investigated the effect of defibulation, excision of cysts, and clitoral reconstruction. Meta-analyses of defibulation versus no defibulation showed a significantly lower risk of caesarean section (relative risk, RR: 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 95% CI: 0.25-0.45) and perineal tears with defibulation: second-degree tear (RR: 0.44, 95% CI: 0.24-0.79), third-degree tear (RR: 0.21, 95% CI: 0.05-0.94), fourth-degree tear (RR: 0.06, 95% CI: 0.01-0.41). The meta-analyses detected no significant differences in obstetric outcomes of antenatal versus intrapartum defibulation. Except for one study, none of the studies on the excision of cysts indicated any complications, and the results were deemed favourable. Reconstructive surgery resulted in a visible clitoris in about 77% of women. Most women self-reported improvements in their sexual life, but up to 22% experienced a worsening in sexuality-related outcomes after reconstruction.
Conclusions: Women with FGM/C who seek therapeutic surgery should be informed about the scarcity of evidence for benefits and the potential harms of the available procedures.
Tweetable abstract: Systematic review shows defibulation after FGM/C has obstetric benefits; effect of reconstruction is uncertain.
Keywords: Defibulation; excision of cyst; female genital mutilation/cutting; obstetric; reconstructive surgery; systematic review.
© 2017 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
The global challenge to improve the sexual and reproductive health of women affected by FGM/C.BJOG. 2018 Feb;125(3):288. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14925. Epub 2017 Oct 16. BJOG. 2018. PMID: 28885779 No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
Obstetric care of women with female genital mutilation attending a specialized clinic in a tertiary center.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016 Feb;132(2):174-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.055. Epub 2015 Oct 9. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016. PMID: 26493013
-
Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting: A Review of Surgical Techniques and Ethical Debate.J Sex Med. 2020 Mar;17(3):531-542. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2019.12.004. Epub 2020 Jan 10. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 31932257 Review.
-
Painful gynecologic and obstetric complications of female genital mutilation/cutting: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS Med. 2020 Mar 31;17(3):e1003088. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003088. eCollection 2020 Mar. PLoS Med. 2020. PMID: 32231359 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical Treatments of Chronic Vulvar Pain After Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting.J Sex Med. 2022 Feb;19(2):290-301. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2021.11.010. Epub 2022 Jan 6. J Sex Med. 2022. PMID: 35000888
-
Obstetric outcomes for women with female genital mutilation at an Australian hospital, 2006-2012: a descriptive study.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016 Oct 28;16(1):328. doi: 10.1186/s12884-016-1123-5. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2016. PMID: 27793119 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Female genital mutilation in the Canary Islands: A qualitative study on the perspectives of women and healthcare professionals.Heliyon. 2023 May 24;9(6):e16223. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e16223. eCollection 2023 Jun. Heliyon. 2023. PMID: 37274704 Free PMC article.
-
Cervical dysplasia among migrant women with female genital mutilation/cutting type III: A cross-sectional study.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022 Jun;157(3):557-563. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13921. Epub 2021 Oct 11. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022. PMID: 34498291 Free PMC article.
-
The Role of Plastic Surgeons in Female Genital Mutilation Reconstructive Surgery.World J Plast Surg. 2021 Jan;10(1):104-107. doi: 10.29252/wjps.10.1.104. World J Plast Surg. 2021. PMID: 33833961 Free PMC article.
-
Swedish Gynecologists' Positioning in Relation to Clitoral Reconstruction After Female Genital Cutting. A Qualitative Interview Study.Int J Sex Health. 2020 Dec 11;33(1):76-87. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2020.1853301. eCollection 2021. Int J Sex Health. 2020. PMID: 38596474 Free PMC article.
-
What are the experiences of seeking, receiving and providing FGM-related healthcare? Perspectives of health professionals and women/girls who have undergone FGM: protocol for a systematic review of qualitative evidence.BMJ Open. 2017 Dec 14;7(12):e018170. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018170. BMJ Open. 2017. PMID: 29247096 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical