Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2017 Dec;14(12):1812-1819.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.07.027. Epub 2017 Jul 27.

Predictors of ventricular arrhythmia after left ventricular assist device implantation: A large single-center observational study

Affiliations
Observational Study

Predictors of ventricular arrhythmia after left ventricular assist device implantation: A large single-center observational study

Elena Efimova et al. Heart Rhythm. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are common in patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the predictors of VAs and their impact on mortality in LVAD patients.

Methods: A total of 98 consecutive patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) (86 [88%] male, mean age 57 ± 10 years), 57 [58%] with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy) who had received an LVAD between May 2011 and December 2013 at our institution were included in the study.

Results: Mean left ventricular ejection fraction and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter were 20% ± 8% and 73 ± 11 mm, respectively. Seventy-three patients (75%) had atrial fibrillation (AF). During the 12 months before LVAD implantation, 38 patients (39%) had experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (11.5 ± 20) requiring ICD therapies. The number of patients with VAs was comparable among all types of ICDs (P = .48). During the 12-month follow-up after LVAD implantation, 48 patients (49%) experienced ≥1 episode of VAs (30 ± 98) with appropriate ICD therapies. The prevalence of VAs was significantly higher among patients with pre-LVAD VAs compared to those without VAs during the year before LVAD implantation (66% vs 38%; P = .008). In a binary multiple logistic regression analysis, pre-LVAD VAs (hazard ratio 5.36, 95% confidence interval 2.0-14.3; P = .001) and AF (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.1-11.9; P = .024) predicted post-LVAD VAs.

Conclusion: Pre-LVAD VAs and AF predict the occurrence of VAs after LVAD implantation. According to the latest data on the negative impact of post-LVAD VAs on all-cause mortality, further studies should clarify the reasonability of maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with AF and/or prophylactic catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias before LVAD implantation.

Keywords: Catheter ablation; Left ventricular assist device; Mortality; Predictors of ventricular arrhythmia occurrence; Ventricular arrhythmia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources