Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Case Reports
. 2017 Jul 28:2017:bcr2017220792.
doi: 10.1136/bcr-2017-220792.

A case of deep infection after instrumentation in dorsal spinal surgery: the management with antibiotics and negative wound pressure without removal of fixation

Affiliations
Case Reports

A case of deep infection after instrumentation in dorsal spinal surgery: the management with antibiotics and negative wound pressure without removal of fixation

Mauro Dobran et al. BMJ Case Rep. .

Abstract

Until today the role of spinal instrumentation in the presence of a wound infection has been widely discussed and recently many authors leave the hardware in place with appropriate antibiotic therapy. This is a case of a 65-year-old woman suffering from degenerative scoliosis and osteoporotic multiple vertebral collapses treated with posterior dorsolumbar stabilisation with screws and rods. Four months later, skin necrosis and infection appeared in the cranial wound with exposure of the rods. A surgical procedure of debridement of the infected tissue and package with a myocutaneous trapezius muscle flap was performed. One week after surgery, negative pressure wound therapy was started on the residual skin defect. The wound healed after 2 months. The aim of this case report is to focus on the utility of this method even in the case of hardware exposure and infection. This may help avoid removing instrumentation and creating instability.

Keywords: Infection (neurology); Infections; Spinal Cord; Surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient came to our attention with severe kyphosis and evident spinal instrumentation at the subcutaneous level.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Extension of stabilisation to the cervical level.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Wound dehiscence after extension of stabilisation to the cervical level.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Wound dehiscence after the second surgical procedure of cervical instrumentation removal.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Revision of the surgical wound with a myocutaneous trapezius muscle flap.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Little wound dehiscence after surgical wound revision.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Vacuum-assisted closure.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Wound closure after 2 months of VAC. VAC, vacuum-assisted closure.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Mehta AI, Babu R, Karikari IO, et al. . 2012 Young Investigator Award winner: The distribution of body mass as a significant risk factor for lumbar spinal fusion postoperative infections. Spine 2012;37:1652–6. 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318241b186 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee MJ, Cizik AM, Hamilton D, et al. . Predicting surgical site infection after spine surgery: a validated model using a prospective surgical registry. Spine J 2014;14:2112–7. 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.12.026 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tao W, Hui W, Da-long Y, et al. . Factors predicting surgical site infection after posterior lumbar surgery. Medicine 2017;96:5. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hiroyuki T, Takao S, Hideki K, et al. . Risk factors for unvaiodable removal of instrumentation after surgical site infection of spine surgery. Medicine 2016;95:43. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sundararaj GD, Amritanand R, Venkatesh K, et al. . The use of titanium mesh cages in the reconstruction of anterior column defects in active spinal infections: can we rest the crest? Asian Spine J 2011;5:155–61. 10.4184/asj.2011.5.3.155 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances