Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Systemically Administered Antileishmanial Drugs
- PMID: 28756612
- PMCID: PMC5784002
- DOI: 10.1007/s40262-017-0570-0
Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Systemically Administered Antileishmanial Drugs
Abstract
This review describes the pharmacokinetic properties of the systemically administered antileishmanial drugs pentavalent antimony, paromomycin, pentamidine, miltefosine and amphotericin B (AMB), including their absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion and potential drug-drug interactions. This overview provides an understanding of their clinical pharmacokinetics, which could assist in rationalising and optimising treatment regimens, especially in combining multiple antileishmanial drugs in an attempt to increase efficacy and shorten treatment duration. Pentavalent antimony pharmacokinetics are characterised by rapid renal excretion of unchanged drug and a long terminal half-life, potentially due to intracellular conversion to trivalent antimony. Pentamidine is the only antileishmanial drug metabolised by cytochrome P450 enzymes. Paromomycin is excreted by the kidneys unchanged and is eliminated fastest of all antileishmanial drugs. Miltefosine pharmacokinetics are characterized by a long terminal half-life and extensive accumulation during treatment. AMB pharmacokinetics differ per drug formulation, with a fast renal and faecal excretion of AMB deoxylate but a much slower clearance of liposomal AMB resulting in an approximately ten-fold higher exposure. AMB and pentamidine pharmacokinetics have never been evaluated in leishmaniasis patients. Studies linking exposure to effect would be required to define target exposure levels in dose optimisation but have only been performed for miltefosine. Limited research has been conducted on exposure at the drug's site of action, such as skin exposure in cutaneous leishmaniasis patients after systemic administration. Pharmacokinetic data on special patient populations such as HIV co-infected patients are mostly lacking. More research in these areas will help improve clinical outcomes by informed dosing and combination of drugs.
Conflict of interest statement
Funding
Thomas P.C. Dorlo was supported by the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) through a personal Veni grant (Project Number 91617140).
Conflict of interest
Anke E. Kip, Jan H.M. Schellens, Jos H. Beijnen and Thomas P.C. Dorlo have no conflicts of interest that are relevant to the content of this review.
Similar articles
-
[Canine leishmaniasis: evolution of the chemotherapeutic protocols].Parassitologia. 2004 Jun;46(1-2):231-4. Parassitologia. 2004. PMID: 15305724 Review. Italian.
-
Bioanalytical methods for pharmacokinetic studies of antileishmanial drugs.Biomed Chromatogr. 2023 Jul;37(7):e5519. doi: 10.1002/bmc.5519. Epub 2022 Nov 4. Biomed Chromatogr. 2023. PMID: 36208186 Review.
-
Effects of fluconazole on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of antimony in cutaneous leishmaniasis-infected hamsters.Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007 Jun;29(6):728-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2007.01.013. Epub 2007 Mar 21. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007. PMID: 17369029
-
New antileishmanial candidates and lead compounds.Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010 Aug;14(4):447-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2010.03.023. Epub 2010 Apr 17. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2010. PMID: 20400358 Review.
-
In vitro activity of nicotinamide/antileishmanial drug combinations.Parasitol Int. 2011 Jan;60(1):19-24. doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2010.09.005. Epub 2010 Sep 25. Parasitol Int. 2011. PMID: 20884376
Cited by
-
Antileishmanial Compounds Isolated from Psidium Guajava L. Using a Metabolomic Approach.Molecules. 2019 Dec 11;24(24):4536. doi: 10.3390/molecules24244536. Molecules. 2019. PMID: 31835791 Free PMC article.
-
Toxicity and Anti-promastigote Activity of Benzoxazinoid Analogs Against Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum.Adv Pharm Bull. 2020 Jan;10(1):119-124. doi: 10.15171/apb.2020.015. Epub 2019 Dec 11. Adv Pharm Bull. 2020. PMID: 32002370 Free PMC article.
-
Nanotechnology based solutions for anti-leishmanial impediments: a detailed insight.J Nanobiotechnology. 2021 Apr 15;19(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12951-021-00853-0. J Nanobiotechnology. 2021. PMID: 33858436 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment failure to sodium stibogluconate in cutaneous leishmaniasis: A challenge to infection control and disease elimination.PLoS One. 2021 Oct 22;16(10):e0259009. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259009. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34679130 Free PMC article.
-
An Overview on Leishmaniasis in Romania: Diagnosis and Therapeutics.Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022 Oct 28;7(11):334. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed7110334. Trop Med Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36355877 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- WHO. Control of the leishmaniases. WHO Technical Report Series #949. 2010. http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44412/1/WHO_TRS_949_eng.pdf. Accessed 7 Feb 2017.
-
- Monge-Maillo B, López-Vélez R. Miltefosine for visceral and cutaneous leishmaniasis: drug characteristics and evidence-based treatment recommendations. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;60:1398–1404. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical