Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Jun;77(6):651-659.
doi: 10.1055/s-0042-113189. Epub 2017 Jun 28.

Genetic Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Prognosis in the Prospectively Randomized SUCCESS A Study

Affiliations

Genetic Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Prognosis in the Prospectively Randomized SUCCESS A Study

A Hein et al. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Jun.

Abstract

Large-scale genotyping studies have identified over 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. However, knowledge regarding genetic risk factors associated with the prognosis is limited. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the prognostic effect of nine known breast cancer risk SNPs. BC patients (n = 1687) randomly sampled in an adjuvant, randomized phase III trial (SUCCESS A study) were genotyped for nine BC risk SNPs: rs17468277 (CASP8) , rs2981582 (FGFR2) , rs13281615(8q24), rs3817198 (LSP1) , rs889312 (MAP3K1) , rs3803662 (TOX3) , rs13387042(2q35), rs4973768 (SLC4A7) , rs6504950 (COX11) . Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the SNPs' association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additional analyses were carried out for molecular subgroups. rs3817198 in LSP1 (lymphocyte-specific protein 1) was the only SNP that significantly influenced OS (p = 0.01) and PFS (p < 0.01) in the likelihood ratio test comparing the genetic survival model with the clinical survival model. In the molecular subgroups, triple-negative patients with two minor alleles in rs3817198 had a much better prognosis relative to OS (adjusted HR 0.03; 95% CI 0.002 - 0.279) and PFS (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.36) than patients with the common alleles. The same effect on PFS was shown for patients with luminal A tumors (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 - 0.84), whereas patients with luminal B tumors had a poorer PFS with two minor alleles (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.40). The variant in rs3817198 has a prognostic effect particularly in the subgroup of patients with triple-negative BC, suggesting a possible link with immunomodulation and BC.

In verschiedenen großangelegten Studien, in denen umfangreiche Genotypisierungsstudien vorgenommen wurden, wurden bislang über 70 Einzelnukleotid-Polymorphismen (SNPs) identifiziert, die mit einem erhöhten Brustkrebsrisiko einhergehen. Aber das Wissen über die mit der Prognose assoziierten Risikofaktoren wächst weniger schnell. Ziel dieser Studie war es daher, die Auswirkungen von 9 bekannten Brustkrebsrisiko-SNPs auf die Prognose zu untersuchen. In einer adjuvanten randomisierten Phase-III-Studie (SUCCESS A-Studie) wurden Brustkrebspatientinnen (n = 1687) einer Genotypisierung unterzogen. Die Patientinnen waren zuvor nach dem Zufallsprinzip ausgewählt worden. Bei der Genotypisierung standen 9 Brustkrebsrisiko-SNPs im Mittelpunkt: rs17468277 (CASP8) , rs2981582 (FGFR2) , rs13281615(8q24), rs3817198 (LSP1) , rs889312 (MAP3K1) , rs3803662 (TOX3) , rs13387042(2q35), rs4973768 (SLC4A7) , rs6504950 (COX11) . Zur Überprüfung des Zusammenhangs zwischen SNP und Gesamtüberleben (OS) bzw. progressionsfreiem Überleben (PFS) wurde eine Cox-Regressionsanalyse durchgeführt. Molekulare Untergruppen wurden einer weiteren Analyse unterzogen. rs3817198 in LSP1 (Lymphozyten-spezifisches Protein 1) war der einzige SNP, für den im Likelihood-Ratio-Test, der das genetische Überlebensmodell mit dem klinischen Überlebensmodell verglich, eine signifikante Auswirkung auf das Gesamtüberleben (p = 0,01) und das progressionsfreie Überleben (p < 0,01) festgestellt wurde. In den molekularen Untergruppen hatten triple-negative Patientinnen mit 2 seltenen Allelen in rs3817198 eine viel bessere Prognose im Hinblick auf ihr Gesamtüberleben (adjustierte HR 0,03; 95%-KI 0,002 – 0,279) und ihr progressionsfreies Überleben (HR 0,09; 95%-KI 0,02 – 0,36), verglichen mit Patientinnen, welche die häufig vorkommenden Allele aufwiesen. Dieselbe Auswirkung auf das progressionsfreie Überleben fand sich auch bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs vom Luminal-A-Typ (HR 0,19; 95%-KI 0,05 – 0,84), während Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs vom Typ Luminal-B und 2 seltenen Allelen ein geringeres progressionsfreies Überleben aufwiesen (HR 2,13; 95%-KI 1,02 – 4,40). Die Variante in rs3817198 hatte besonders auf die Untergruppe von Patientinnen mit triple-negativem Brustkrebs eine prognostische Auswirkung, was auf eine mögliche Assoziation zwischen Immunmodulation und Brustkrebs hindeutet.

Keywords: LSP1; SNP; TNBC; breast cancer; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Peter Fasching has received honoraria from Genomic Health, Teva, Novartis, Amgen, Pfizer and Roche, and he has conducted research for Novartis and Amgen. Brigitte Rack has received research funding from Chugai, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH, Lilly, Novartis and AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Kaplan–Meier curves for SNP rs3817198, showing overall survival ( a ) and progression-free survival ( b ) relative to the genotypes in the subgroup of triple-negative patients.

Similar articles

  • The role of genetic breast cancer susceptibility variants as prognostic factors.
    Fasching PA, Pharoah PD, Cox A, Nevanlinna H, Bojesen SE, Karn T, Broeks A, van Leeuwen FE, van't Veer LJ, Udo R, Dunning AM, Greco D, Aittomäki K, Blomqvist C, Shah M, Nordestgaard BG, Flyger H, Hopper JL, Southey MC, Apicella C, Garcia-Closas M, Sherman M, Lissowska J, Seynaeve C, Huijts PE, Tollenaar RA, Ziogas A, Ekici AB, Rauh C, Mannermaa A, Kataja V, Kosma VM, Hartikainen JM, Andrulis IL, Ozcelik H, Mulligan AM, Glendon G, Hall P, Czene K, Liu J, Chang-Claude J, Wang-Gohrke S, Eilber U, Nickels S, Dörk T, Schiekel M, Bremer M, Park-Simon TW, Giles GG, Severi G, Baglietto L, Hooning MJ, Martens JW, Jager A, Kriege M, Lindblom A, Margolin S, Couch FJ, Stevens KN, Olson JE, Kosel M, Cross SS, Balasubramanian SP, Reed MW, Miron A, John EM, Winqvist R, Pylkäs K, Jukkola-Vuorinen A, Kauppila S, Burwinkel B, Marme F, Schneeweiss A, Sohn C, Chenevix-Trench G; kConFab Investigators; Lambrechts D, Dieudonne AS, Hatse S, van Limbergen E, Benitez J, Milne RL, Zamora MP, Pérez JI, Bonanni B, Peissel B, Loris B, Peterlongo P, Rajaraman P, Schonfeld SJ, Anton-Culver H, Devilee P, Beckmann MW, Slamon DJ, Phillips KA, Figueroa JD, Humphreys MK, Easton DF, Schmidt MK. Fasching PA, et al. Hum Mol Genet. 2012 Sep 1;21(17):3926-39. doi: 10.1093/hmg/dds159. Epub 2012 Apr 24. Hum Mol Genet. 2012. PMID: 22532573 Free PMC article.
  • Interactions between genetic variants and breast cancer risk factors in the breast and prostate cancer cohort consortium.
    Campa D, Kaaks R, Le Marchand L, Haiman CA, Travis RC, Berg CD, Buring JE, Chanock SJ, Diver WR, Dostal L, Fournier A, Hankinson SE, Henderson BE, Hoover RN, Isaacs C, Johansson M, Kolonel LN, Kraft P, Lee IM, McCarty CA, Overvad K, Panico S, Peeters PH, Riboli E, Sanchez MJ, Schumacher FR, Skeie G, Stram DO, Thun MJ, Trichopoulos D, Zhang S, Ziegler RG, Hunter DJ, Lindström S, Canzian F. Campa D, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Aug 17;103(16):1252-63. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr265. Epub 2011 Jul 26. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011. PMID: 21791674 Free PMC article.
  • Assessing interactions between the associations of common genetic susceptibility variants, reproductive history and body mass index with breast cancer risk in the breast cancer association consortium: a combined case-control study.
    Milne RL, Gaudet MM, Spurdle AB, Fasching PA, Couch FJ, Benítez J, Arias Pérez JI, Zamora MP, Malats N, Dos Santos Silva I, Gibson LJ, Fletcher O, Johnson N, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Figueroa J, Brinton L, Sherman ME, Lissowska J, Hopper JL, Dite GS, Apicella C, Southey MC, Sigurdson AJ, Linet MS, Schonfeld SJ, Freedman DM, Mannermaa A, Kosma VM, Kataja V, Auvinen P, Andrulis IL, Glendon G, Knight JA, Weerasooriya N, Cox A, Reed MW, Cross SS, Dunning AM, Ahmed S, Shah M, Brauch H, Ko YD, Brüning T; GENICA Network; Lambrechts D, Reumers J, Smeets A, Wang-Gohrke S, Hall P, Czene K, Liu J, Irwanto AK, Chenevix-Trench G, Holland H; kConFab; AOCS; Giles GG, Baglietto L, Severi G, Bojensen SE, Nordestgaard BG, Flyger H, John EM, West DW, Whittemore AS, Vachon C, Olson JE, Fredericksen Z, Kosel M, Hein R, Vrieling A, Flesch-Janys D, Heinz J, Beckmann MW, Heusinger K, Ekici AB, Haeberle L, Humphreys MK, Morrison J, Easton DF, Pharoah PD, García-Closas M, Goode EL, Chang-Claude J. Milne RL, et al. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R110. doi: 10.1186/bcr2797. Epub 2010 Dec 31. Breast Cancer Res. 2010. PMID: 21194473 Free PMC article.
  • Low-penetrance susceptibility variants and postmenopausal oestrogen receptor positive breast cancer.
    Özgöz A, İçduygu FM, Yükseltürk A, ŞamlI H, Öztürk KH, Başkan Z. Özgöz A, et al. J Genet. 2020;99:15. J Genet. 2020. PMID: 32366738
  • Genetic polymorphisms and breast cancer risk: evidence from meta-analyses, pooled analyses, and genome-wide association studies.
    Peng S, Lü B, Ruan W, Zhu Y, Sheng H, Lai M. Peng S, et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011 Jun;127(2):309-24. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1459-5. Epub 2011 Mar 29. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011. PMID: 21445572 Review.

Cited by

References

    1. Curtis C, Shah S P, Chin S F. The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups. Nature. 2012;486:346–352. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sotiriou C, Pusztai L. Gene-expression signatures in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:790–800. - PubMed
    1. Wang L, McLeod H L, Weinshilboum R M. Genomics and drug response. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1144–1153. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cancer Genome Atlas Network . Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature. 2012;490:61–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Weinshilboum R M, Wang L. Pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics: development, science, and translation. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:223–245. - PubMed