Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Jul 13:9:1179065217719023.
doi: 10.1177/1179065217719023. eCollection 2017.

Mitral Valve Replacement-Current and Future Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Mitral Valve Replacement-Current and Future Perspectives

Johan van der Merwe et al. Open J Cardiovasc Surg. .

Abstract

The favorable outcomes achieved with modern mitral valve repair techniques redefined the role of mitral valve replacement. Various international databases report a significant decrease in replacement procedures performed compared with repairs, and contemporary guidelines limit the application of surgical mitral valve replacement to pathology in which durable repair is unlikely to be achieved. The progressive paradigm shift toward endoscopic and robotic mitral valve surgery is also paralleled by rapid developments in transcatheter devices, which is progressively expanding from experimental approaches to becoming clinical reality. This article outlines the current role and future perspectives of contemporary surgical mitral valve replacement within the context of mitral valve repair and the dynamic evolution of exciting transcatheter alternatives.

Keywords: Mitral valve replacement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declaration of conflicting interests:The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Examples of current Food and Drug Administration–approved mitral valve prostheses: (A) Medtronic Hall tilting disk, (B) On-X, (C) St. Jude Medical, (D) Carpentier-Edwards Perimount, (E) Mosaic, and (F) Hancock II.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Endoscopic mitral valve surgery using long-shaft instruments and peripheral cannulation.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Examples of percutaneous mitral valve replacement prosthesis: (A) CardiAQ and (B) Tendyne.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cosgrove DM, Chavez AM, Lytle BW, et al. Results of mitral valve reconstruction. Circulation. 1986;74:I82–I87. - PubMed
    1. Lawrie GM. Mitral valve repair vs. replacement: current recommendations and long-term results. Cardiol Clin. 1998;16:437–448. - PubMed
    1. Lehmann S, Walther T, Kempfert J, et al. Stentless mitral valve implantation in comparison to conventional mitral valve repair or replacement at five years. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;54:10–14. - PubMed
    1. Grossi EA, Galloway AC, Miller JS, et al. Valve repair versus replacement for mitral insufficiency: when is a mechanical valve still indicated? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;115:389; discussion 394. - PubMed
    1. Perier P. A new paradigm for the repair of posterior leaflet prolapse: respect rather than resect. Op Techniques Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;10:180–193.