Kidney allograft offers: Predictors of turndown and the impact of late organ acceptance on allograft survival
- PMID: 28758329
- PMCID: PMC5790617
- DOI: 10.1111/ajt.14449
Kidney allograft offers: Predictors of turndown and the impact of late organ acceptance on allograft survival
Abstract
There is growing interest in understanding patterns of organ acceptance and reducing discard. Little is known about how donor factors, timing of procurement, and geographic location affect organ offer decisions. We performed a retrospective cohort study of 47 563 deceased donor kidney match-runs from 2007 to 2013. Several characteristics unrelated to allograft quality were independently associated with later acceptance in the match-run: Public Health Service increased-risk donor status (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.49, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.29-2.69), holiday or weekend procurement (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.07-1.16), shorter donor stature (aOR 1.53 for <150 cm vs reference >180 cm, 95% CI 1.28-1.94), and procurement in an area with higher intensity of market competition (aOR 1.71, 95% CI 1.62-1.78) and with the longest waiting times (aOR 1.41, 95% CI 1.34-1.49). Later acceptance in the match-run was associated with delayed graft function but not all-cause allograft failure (adjusted hazard ratio 1.01, 95% CI 0.96-1.07). Study limitations include a lack of match-run data for discarded organs and the possibility of sequence inaccuracies for some nonlocal matches. Interventions are needed to reduce turndowns of viable organs, especially when decisions are driven by infectious risk, weekend or holiday procurement, geography, or other donor characteristics unrelated to allograft quality.
Keywords: clinical research/practice; donors and donation: deceased; ethics and public policy; kidney (allograft) function/dysfunction; kidney transplantation/nephrology; organ acceptance; organ allocation; organ procurement and allocation; waitlist management.
© 2017 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose as described by the
Figures
Comment in
-
Kidney transplant outcomes: Does position on the match-run matter?Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1576. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14734. Epub 2018 Apr 2. Am J Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29575503 No abstract available.
-
Kidney transplant outcomes: Position in the match-run does not seem to matter beyond other donor risk factors.Am J Transplant. 2018 Jun;18(6):1577-1578. doi: 10.1111/ajt.14883. Epub 2018 May 11. Am J Transplant. 2018. PMID: 29673067 No abstract available.
References
-
- Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: National Data. Richmond, VA: Accessed Jauary 10, 2017 [Available from: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov.
-
- Marrero WJ, Naik AS, Friedewald JJ, Xu Y, Hutton DW, Lavieri MS, et al. Predictors of Deceased Donor Kidney Discard in the United States. Transplantation. 2016 - PubMed
-
- Heilman RL, Mathur A, Smith ML, Kaplan B, Reddy KS. Increasing the Use of Kidneys From Unconventional and High-Risk Deceased Donors. Am J Transplant. 2016;16(11):3086–92. - PubMed
-
- Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network: COIIN project studying effective practices at model hospitals, OPOs. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services; 2016. Accessed January 6, 2017 [Available from: https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/news/coiin-project-studying-effective-p....
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
