Resection plane-dependent error in computed tomography volumetry of the right hepatic lobe in living liver donors
- PMID: 28759989
- PMCID: PMC5875195
- DOI: 10.3350/cmh.2017.0023
Resection plane-dependent error in computed tomography volumetry of the right hepatic lobe in living liver donors
Abstract
Background/aims: Computed tomography (CT) hepatic volumetry is currently accepted as the most reliable method for preoperative estimation of graft weight in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT). However, several factors can cause inaccuracies in CT volumetry compared to real graft weight. The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency and degree of resection plane-dependent error in CT volumetry of the right hepatic lobe in LDLT.
Methods: Forty-six living liver donors underwent CT before donor surgery and on postoperative day 7. Prospective CT volumetry (VP) was measured via the assumptive hepatectomy plane. Retrospective liver volume (VR) was measured using the actual plane by comparing preoperative and postoperative CT. Compared with intraoperatively measured weight (W), errors in percentage (%) VP and VR were evaluated. Plane-dependent error in VP was defined as the absolute difference between VP and VR. % plane-dependent error was defined as follows: |VP-VR|/W∙100.
Results: Mean VP, VR, and W were 761.9 mL, 755.0 mL, and 696.9 g. Mean and % errors in VP were 73.3 mL and 10.7%. Mean error and % error in VR were 64.4 mL and 9.3%. Mean plane-dependent error in VP was 32.4 mL. Mean % plane-dependent error was 4.7%. Plane-dependent error in VP exceeded 10% of W in approximately 10% of the subjects in our study.
Conclusions: There was approximately 5% plane-dependent error in liver VP on CT volumetry. Plane-dependent error in VP exceeded 10% of W in approximately 10% of LDLT donors in our study. This error should be considered, especially when CT volumetry is performed by a less experienced operator who is not well acquainted with the donor hepatectomy plane.
Keywords: Liver; Liver transplantation; Living Donors; Organ volume; Volumetric computed tomography.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures


Comment in
-
Clinical implication of hepatic volumetry for living donor liver transplantation.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;24(1):51-53. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.1003. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29580036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Similar articles
-
CT and MR imaging evaluation of living liver donors.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02385-6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 31901101 Review.
-
V5-drainage-preserved right lobe grafts improve graft congestion for living donor liver transplantation.Transplantation. 2012 May 15;93(9):929-35. doi: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3182488bd8. Transplantation. 2012. PMID: 22461038
-
Three-Dimensional Volumetric Assessment of Graft Volume in Living Donor Liver Transplantation: Does It Minimise Errors of Estimation?J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020 Jan-Feb;10(1):1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2019.03.006. Epub 2019 Mar 26. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2020. PMID: 32025161 Free PMC article.
-
Dr. Liver: A preoperative planning system of liver graft volumetry for living donor liver transplantation.Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018 May;158:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.024. Epub 2018 Jan 31. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018. PMID: 29544776
-
Adult living donor liver imaging.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016 May-Jun;22(3):207-14. doi: 10.5152/dir.2016.15323. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26912106 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Clinical implication of hepatic volumetry for living donor liver transplantation.Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018 Mar;24(1):51-53. doi: 10.3350/cmh.2018.1003. Epub 2018 Mar 22. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2018. PMID: 29580036 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Fully automated assessment of the future liver remnant in a blood-free setting via CT before major hepatectomy via deep learning.Insights Imaging. 2024 Jun 27;15(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13244-024-01724-6. Insights Imaging. 2024. PMID: 38935177 Free PMC article.
-
Radiomics Beyond Radiology: Literature Review on Prediction of Future Liver Remnant Volume and Function Before Hepatic Surgery.J Clin Med. 2025 Jul 28;14(15):5326. doi: 10.3390/jcm14155326. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40806948 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Manual and semi-automated computed tomography volumetry significantly overestimates the right liver lobe graft weight: a single-center study with adult living liver donors.Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024 Jan 8;30(1):3-8. doi: 10.4274/dir.2023.221903. Epub 2023 May 8. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2024. PMID: 37154817 Free PMC article.
-
CT and MR imaging evaluation of living liver donors.Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021 Jan;46(1):17-28. doi: 10.1007/s00261-019-02385-6. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2021. PMID: 31901101 Review.
References
-
- Lee SG, Park KM, Lee YJ, Hwang S, Choi DR, Ahn CS, et al. 157 adult-to-adult living donor liver transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1323–1325. - PubMed
-
- Inomata Y, Uemoto S, Asonuma K, Egawa H. Right lobe graft in living donor liver transplantation. Transplantation. 2000;69:258–264. - PubMed
-
- Suh K, Lee K, Roh HR, Koh YT, Minn KW, Kim SJ, et al. Outcome of adult living donor liver transplantation using small volume of left liver graft less than 1% of body weight. Transplant Proc. 2001;33:1401–1402. - PubMed
-
- Kiuchi T, Tanaka K, Ito T, Oike F, Ogura Y, Fujimoto Y, et al. Small-for-size graft in living donor liver transplantation: how far should we go? Liver Transpl. 2003;9:S29–S35. - PubMed
-
- Ito T, Kiuchi T, Egawa H, Kaihara S, Oike F, Ogura Y, et al. Surgery-related morbidity in living donors of right-lobe liver graft: lessons from the first 200 cases. Transplantation. 2003;76:158–163. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical