Efficacy of arthrocentesis versus arthrocentesis with sodium hyaluronic acid in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A comparison
- PMID: 28761275
- PMCID: PMC5512408
- DOI: 10.4103/njms.NJMS_84_16
Efficacy of arthrocentesis versus arthrocentesis with sodium hyaluronic acid in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis: A comparison
Abstract
Introduction: Temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJ OA) is a degenerative disease characterized by deterioration of articular tissue with concomitant osseous changes in the condyle and/or articular eminence, joint positive for TMJ noise with jaw movement or function, crepitus detected on palpation on opening, closing, right/left lateral, or protrusive movement. Hyaluronic acid (HA) is a polysaccharide of the family of glycosaminoglycans. HA has been shown to improve and restore normal lubrication in joint, provide nutrition to the avascular articulating disc, and stabilize the joint.
Materials and methods: Twenty patients with OA of TMJ with age limit between 18 and 60 years of age were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into two groups, in which one group received arthrocentesis only, and another group received arthrocentesis plus intra-articular injection of sodium HA (0.5 ml) in superior joint space in a cycle of 5 weekly arthrocentesis (one per week). Patients were followed at regular interval of 1st day, 5th day, 7th day, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, and 12 weeks. Assessment of clinical outcome was done in terms of reduction in pain (visual analog scale score), maximum mouth opening (MMO) in millimeters, painful/pain-free lateral or protrusive jaw movement, and clicking/crepitus in joint.
Results: Significant reduction in pain was observed in both the groups. MMO, lateral and protrusive movements improved significantly in both groups; however, arthrocentesis with sodium HA was superior to arthrocentesis alone.
Conclusion: Combination of arthrocentesis with HA injection showed much better outcome than arthrocentesis alone.
Keywords: Arthrocentesis; hyaluronic acid; osteoarthritis; temporomandibular joint.
Conflict of interest statement
There are no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Dworkin SF, LeResche L. Research diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders:Review, criteria, examinations and specifications, critique. J Craniomandib Disord. 1992;6:301–55. - PubMed
-
- Schiffman E, Ohrbach R, Truelove E, Look J, Anderson G, Goulet JP, et al. Diagnostic criteria for temporomandibular disorders (DC/TMD) for clinical and research applications: Recommendations of the international RDC/TMD consortium network* and orofacial pain special interest group†. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2014;28:6–27. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Gadek A, Miskowiec K, Wordliczek J, Liszka H. Effectiveness and safety of intra-articular use of hyaluronic acid (Suplasyn) in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis. Przegl Lek. 2011;68:307–10. - PubMed
-
- Brusie RW, Sullins KE, White NA, 2nd, Coffin PC, Parker GA, Anver MR, et al. Evaluation of sodium hyaluronate therapy in induced septic arthritis in the horse. Equine Vet J Suppl. 1992;11:18–23. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
