Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Dec;21(12):2135-2143.
doi: 10.1007/s11605-017-3516-9. Epub 2017 Jul 31.

Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using the Lateral Approach from Intercostal Ports in Segments VI, VII, and VIII

Affiliations

Laparoscopic Liver Resection Using the Lateral Approach from Intercostal Ports in Segments VI, VII, and VIII

Yoshihiro Inoue et al. J Gastrointest Surg. 2017 Dec.

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has been developed as a minimally invasive surgery. However, challenges such as difficulty securing visibility and limited control of forceps make it difficult to complete LLR in hepatic segments VI, VII, and VIII. To overcome these challenges, we devised a surgical technique using intercostal ports. We termed this approach the lateral approach. This work describes our experience performing LLR using this approach and discusses the safety and effectiveness of this approach.

Methods: Between April 2011 and December 2016, data from 91 patients who underwent LLR with or without the intercostal port at a single institution were retrospectively analyzed regarding surgical outcomes, safety, and utility.

Results: LLR was performed for 32 patients with the intercostal port and for 59 patients without the intercostal port. The conversion rates to open surgery with and without intercostal ports were 3.1 and 25.4% (P = 0.008). In hepatic segments VII and VIII, the rates of conversion to open surgery were significantly lower for cases involving intercostal ports (6.7 vs. 42.9 and 0 vs. 38.9%; P = 0.035 and 0026, respectively); however, there were no differences in hepatic segment VI (0 vs. 7.4%; P = 0.563). There were no differences in operative time, blood loss volume, surgical margin, curative resection rate, or postoperative complication rate for LLR in all segments (VI, VII, and VIII). No adverse events due to placement of the intercostal port were observed in this set of patients.

Conclusion: LLR using the lateral approach and intercostal ports for hepatic segments VII and VIII resulted in a significant decrease in conversion rates to open surgery.

Keywords: Co-axial position; Intercostal port; Laparoscopic liver resection; Lateral approach; Triangular formation.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30 - PubMed
    1. Ann Surg. 2012 Dec;256(6):959-64 - PubMed
    1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Oct;21(10):745-53 - PubMed
    1. J Gastrointest Surg. 2012 Jun;16(6):1171-80 - PubMed
    1. Chest. 1979 Apr;75(4):520-2 - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources