Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;38(8):857-862.
doi: 10.15537/smj.2017.8.18084.

The use of oral and maxillofacial pathology services by general pathologists and their attitude towards it in Saudi Arabia

Nada O Binmadi  1 , Soulafa A Almazrooa
Affiliations

The use of oral and maxillofacial pathology services by general pathologists and their attitude towards it in Saudi Arabia

Nada O Binmadi et al. Saudi Med J. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

To investigate the awareness and usage of oral and maxillofacial pathology (OMFP) subspecialty services among pathologists in Saudi Arabia. Methods: In this cross-sectional study, we conducted an electronic questionnaire survey of pathologists in all regions of Saudi Arabia. The study was conducted between July 2015 and August 2016. The questionnaire comprised 19 questions to evaluate the knowledge of pathologists regarding microscopic OMFP and their perceptions towards this subspecialty. Results: Most of the pathologists surveyed (94.6%) were aware of the OMFP subspecialty and its scope of practice. Although most of the pathologists recognized the importance and need of this subspecialty, 70% of them never referred or consulted an oral pathologist as they either diagnosed the cases themselves or did not know any oral pathologist (57.7%). The pathologists had the greatest difficulty in identifying and diagnosing odontogenic tumors, salivary gland tumors, and odontogenic cysts. Conclusion: Pathologists are aware of the OMFP subspecialty, but their utilization of the services offered by OMFP specialists in Saudi Arabia is quite low despite the strong demand for OMFP services.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The oral and maxillofacial pathological lesions that are the most difficult to diagnose for general pathologists.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Source of specimens of oral and maxillofacial (OMF) pathology based on the pathologists’ opinions. ENT - ear-nose-tongue surgeon
Figure 3
Figure 3
The nature of the specimens sent to oral and maxillofacial pathology specialists for a second opinion.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kirkham N. Millennial reviews The pathologist in the 21st century-generalist or specialist ? J Clin Pathol. 2000;53:7–9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology. What is an oral and maxillofacial pathologist (OMP)? Wheaton, Illinois (USA): American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology; 2009.
    1. Oliveira E, Silva KR, Siqueira ALL, Caldeira PC, de Abreu MHNG, de Aguiar MCF. Profile of usage of a reference diagnostic service on oral pathology: a 10-year evaluation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:653. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chugh D, McComb RJ, Mock D. The effect of funding cuts on the utilization of an oral pathology diagnostic service. Int J Oral Sci. 2009;1:151–155. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kronz JD, Westra WH. The role of second opinion pathology in the management of lesions of the head and neck. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;13:81–84. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources