Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Aug 1;14(8):864.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph14080864.

A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye

Affiliations
Review

A Review of the Benefits of Nature Experiences: More Than Meets the Eye

Lara S Franco et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Evidence that experiences of nature can benefit people has accumulated rapidly. Yet perhaps because of the domination of the visual sense in humans, most research has focused on the visual aspects of nature experiences. However, humans are multisensory, and it seems likely that many benefits are delivered through the non-visual senses and these are potentially avenues through which a physiological mechanism could occur. Here we review the evidence around these lesser studied sensory pathways-through sound, smell, taste, touch, and three non-sensory pathways. Natural sounds and smells underpin experiences of nature for many people, and this may well be rooted in evolutionary psychology. Tactile experiences of nature, particularly beyond animal petting, are understudied yet potentially fundamentally important. Tastes of nature, through growing and consuming natural foods, have been linked with a range of health and well-being benefits. Beyond the five senses, evidence is emerging for other non-visual pathways for nature experiences to be effective. These include ingestion or inhalation of phytoncides, negative air ions and microbes. We conclude that (i) these non-visual avenues are potentially important for delivering benefits from nature experiences; (ii) the evidence base is relatively weak and often based on correlational studies; and (iii) deeper exploration of these sensory and non-sensory avenues is needed.

Keywords: nature benefits; nature experience; nature therapy; sensory; wellbeing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The founding sponsors had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the decision to publish the results

References

    1. Hartig T., Mitchell R., de Vries S., Frumkin H. Nature and health. Ann. Rev. Public Health. 2014;35:207–228. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182443. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Shanahan D.F., Fuller R.A., Bush R., Lin B.B., Gaston K.J. The health benefits of urban nature: How much do we need? BioScience. 2015;65:476–485. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biv032. - DOI
    1. Burford A. The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros. University of Toronto Press; Toronto, ON, Canada: 1969.
    1. Thompson C.W. Linking landscape and health: The recurring theme. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2011;99:187–195. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.10.006. - DOI
    1. Montford A. Health, Sickness, and the Friars in the Thirteenth and Fourteenth Centuries. Ashgate; Aldershot, UK: 2004.

LinkOut - more resources