Risk of malignancy on suspicion of polyps in menopausal women
- PMID: 28763739
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.07.013
Risk of malignancy on suspicion of polyps in menopausal women
Abstract
Improved performances in gynaecological ultrasonography have enabled an increasing number of often asymptomatic endometrial polyps to be detected. Most of these polyps are removed surgically, as a precautionary measure, so as not to miss a case of endometrial cancer. Nonetheless, this management strategy is based solely on the sonographer's judgement and a number of these operations, which are probably of no benefit, could be avoided. In order to do so, risk factors for malignancy need to be identified.
Objective: Estimate the prevalence of lesions in menopausal patients with a pre-operative diagnosis of endometrial polyp. Establish risk factors for malignancy.
Study design: This is a single-centre retrospective study. Enrolment criteria were menopausal patients aged over 45 who had undergone hysteroscopic resection of a polyp. Pre-op diagnosis was made either by ultrasonography or diagnostic hysteroscopy. Malignant lesions included cancers and atypical hyperplasia. Benign lesions consisted of simple polyps, non-atypical simple hyperplasia and non-atypical complex hyperplasia. Risk factors studied were existing abnormal uterine bleeding, endometrial thickness, personal or first-degree family history of gynaecological cancer (breast, cervix, endometrium, ovary) and age on diagnosis.
Results: 631 patients were enrolled of whom 30 presented a malignant disorder (4.75%); 579 patients (91.76%) presented a simple polyp, 11 a non-atypical simple hyperplasia (1.74%) and 11 a non-atypical complex hyperplasia (1.74%). On univariate analysis age alone proved to be statistically significant (OR 1.05; 95%CI=[1.02-1.09] p<0.01), with a threshold of 59 years of age on the ROC curve. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of a malignant lesion were age (OR=1.06; 95%CI [1.02-1.10]), existence of AUB (OR=2.4; 95% CI [1.07-5.42]) and family history (OR=2.88; 95%CI [1.08-7.67]). Neither the univariate nor multivariate model was able to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship with respect to endometrial thickness. The risk of malignancy was 12.3% in patients aged over 59 presenting AUB. For all other subgroups, the risk varied between 2.31 and 3.78%.
Conclusion: The risk of a malignant lesion appears to be high (12%) in menopausal patients aged over 59 presenting an endometrial polyp detected when there is pre-existing AUB. In this situation, hysteroscopic resection of endometrial polyps should therefore be routinely proposed. For other patients, the risk of a malignant lesion is low but not insignificant, standing at about 3%. Each patient record should therefore be discussed on an individual case basis, taking into consideration the patient's pre-existing conditions, after providing clear and appropriate information.
Keywords: Endometrial polyps; Hysteroscopy; Menopause.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Do endometrial lesions require removal? A retrospective study.BMC Womens Health. 2019 May 6;19(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12905-019-0756-8. BMC Womens Health. 2019. PMID: 31060530 Free PMC article.
-
Endometrial polyps detected at ultrasound and rate of malignancy.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Apr;289(4):839-43. doi: 10.1007/s00404-013-3037-z. Epub 2013 Oct 5. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014. PMID: 24091484
-
Hysterscopic Resection of Premalignant and Malignant Endometrial Polyps: Is it a Safe Alternative to Hysterectomy?J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017 Nov-Dec;24(7):1200-1203. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2017.08.002. Epub 2017 Aug 9. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28802955
-
The risk of malignancy in uterine polyps: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019 Jun;237:48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2019.04.009. Epub 2019 Apr 15. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019. PMID: 31009859
-
Endometrial polyps. An evidence-based diagnosis and management guide.Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021 May;260:70-77. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.03.017. Epub 2021 Mar 13. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021. PMID: 33756339 Review.
Cited by
-
Preoperative Haematologic Markers for the Differentiation of Endometrial Cancer from Benign Endometrial Lesions in Postmenopausal Patients with Endometrial Masses.Cancer Manag Res. 2023 Oct 6;15:1111-1121. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S430013. eCollection 2023. Cancer Manag Res. 2023. PMID: 37822733 Free PMC article.
-
Association of endometrial thickness with lesions in postmenopausal asymptomatic women: risk factors and diagnostic thresholds.BMC Womens Health. 2025 Mar 8;25(1):105. doi: 10.1186/s12905-025-03641-2. BMC Womens Health. 2025. PMID: 40057773 Free PMC article.
-
Malignancy risk factors based on endometrial polyp.BMC Womens Health. 2024 Oct 21;24(1):567. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03406-3. BMC Womens Health. 2024. PMID: 39434154 Free PMC article.
-
Polycystic ovary syndrome is associated with a higher risk of premalignant and malignant endometrial polyps in premenopausal women: a retrospective study in a tertiary teaching hospital.BMC Womens Health. 2023 Mar 24;23(1):127. doi: 10.1186/s12905-023-02269-4. BMC Womens Health. 2023. PMID: 36964546 Free PMC article.
-
Pathological pattern of endometrial abnormalities in postmenopausal women with bleeding or thickened endometrium.World J Clin Cases. 2022 Mar 6;10(7):2159-2165. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i7.2159. World J Clin Cases. 2022. PMID: 35321190 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous