Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data
- PMID: 28764555
- PMCID: PMC5714674
- DOI: 10.1177/1740774517723829
Repeated measures dose-finding design with time-trend detection in the presence of correlated toxicity data
Abstract
Background: Phase I trials are designed to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose of therapeutic agents for subsequent testing. The dose-finding paradigm has thus traditionally focused on identifying the maximum tolerable dose of an agent or combination therapy under the assumption that there is a non-decreasing relationship between dose-toxicity and dose-efficacy. The dose is typically determined based on the probability of severe toxicity observed during the first treatment cycle. A novel endpoint, the total toxicity profile, was previously developed to account for the multiple toxicity types and grades experienced in the first cycle. More recently, this was extended to a repeated measures design based on the total toxicity profile to account for longitudinal toxicities over multiple treatment cycles in the absence of within-patient correlation.
Methods: In this work, we propose to extend the design in the presence of within-patient correlation. Furthermore, we provide a framework to detect a toxicity time trend (toxicity increasing, decreasing, or stable) over multiple treatment cycles. We utilize a linear mixed model in the Bayesian framework, with the addition of Bayesian risk functions for decision-making in dose assignment.
Results: The performance of this design was evaluated using simulation studies and real data from a phase I trial. We demonstrated that using available toxicity data from all cycles of treatment improves the accuracy of maximum tolerated dose identification and allows for the detection of a time trend. The performance is consistent regardless of the strength of the within-patient correlation. In addition, the use of a quasi-continuous total toxicity profile score significantly increased the power to detect time trends compared to when binary data only were used.
Conclusion: The increased interest in molecularly targeted agents and immunotherapies in oncology necessitates innovative phase I study designs. Our proposed framework provides a tool to tackle some of the challenges presented by these novel agents, specifically through the ability to understand patterns of toxicity over time, which is important in the cases of cumulative or late toxicities.
Keywords: Dose-finding; adaptive; continual reassessment method; correlated toxicity; immunotherapy; maximum tolerated dose; molecularly targeted agents; phase I clinical trials; repeated measures; time trend.
Figures


Similar articles
-
A Bayesian dose-finding design incorporating toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.Stat Med. 2017 Jan 15;36(1):67-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.7134. Epub 2016 Sep 15. Stat Med. 2017. PMID: 27633877 Free PMC article.
-
An adaptive multi-stage phase I dose-finding design incorporating continuous efficacy and toxicity data from multiple treatment cycles.J Biopharm Stat. 2019;29(2):271-286. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2018.1535497. Epub 2018 Nov 7. J Biopharm Stat. 2019. PMID: 30403559 Free PMC article.
-
Dose-finding design using mixed-effect proportional odds model for longitudinal graded toxicity data in phase I oncology clinical trials.Stat Med. 2013 Dec 30;32(30):5430-47. doi: 10.1002/sim.5960. Epub 2013 Sep 10. Stat Med. 2013. PMID: 24018535
-
Early phase trial designs and endpoints for targeted therapies in rare genotype subsets.Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014:e107-10. doi: 10.14694/EdBook_AM.2014.34.e107. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2014. PMID: 24857087 Review.
-
The performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I clinical trials in oncology : A quantitative comparison of the performance of model-based versus rule-based phase I trials with molecularly targeted anticancer drugs over the last 2 years.J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016 Jun;43(3):235-42. doi: 10.1007/s10928-016-9466-0. Epub 2016 Mar 10. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2016. PMID: 26960536 Review.
Cited by
-
Proportional odds assumption for modeling longitudinal ordinal multiple toxicity outcomes in dose finding studies of targeted agents: A pooled analysis of 54 studies.Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020 Jan 25;17:100529. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100529. eCollection 2020 Mar. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2020. PMID: 32055745 Free PMC article.
-
A Road Map for Designing Phase I Clinical Trials of Radiotherapy-Novel Agent Combinations.Clin Cancer Res. 2022 Sep 2;28(17):3639-3651. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-21-4087. Clin Cancer Res. 2022. PMID: 35552622 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Challenges, opportunities, and innovative statistical designs for precision oncology trials.Ann Transl Med. 2022 Sep;10(18):1038. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-356. Ann Transl Med. 2022. PMID: 36267789 Free PMC article. Review.
-
phase1RMD: An R package for repeated measures dose-finding designs with novel toxicity and efficacy endpoints.PLoS One. 2021 Sep 2;16(9):e0256391. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256391. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 34473708 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Paoletti X, Doussau A, Ezzalfani M, et al. Dose finding with longitudinal data: simpler models, richer outcomes. Stat Med. 2015;34:2983–2998. - PubMed
-
- Postel-Vinay S, Aspeslagh S, Lanoy E, et al. Challenges of phase 1 clinical trials evaluating immune checkpoint-targeted antibodies. Ann Oncol. 2016;27:214–224. - PubMed
-
- Weber JS, O’Day S, Urba W, et al. Phase I/II study of ipilimumab for patients with metastatic melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:5950–5956. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources