Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2017 Oct;47(4):703-724.
doi: 10.1177/0020731417722087. Epub 2017 Aug 2.

Uncovering How Urban Regeneration Programs May Stimulate Leisure-time Walking Among Adults in Deprived Areas: A Realist Review

Affiliations
Review

Uncovering How Urban Regeneration Programs May Stimulate Leisure-time Walking Among Adults in Deprived Areas: A Realist Review

Daniëlle Kramer et al. Int J Health Serv. 2017 Oct.

Abstract

Evidence suggests that urban regeneration programs can stimulate leisure-time walking (LTW) in deprived areas. However, underlying pathways remain unclear. This study explored how urban regeneration might stimulate LTW among adults in deprived areas. We conducted a realist review, a theory-driven approach to evidence synthesis that focuses on mechanisms. We searched three electronic databases for peer-reviewed literature that describes how the neighborhood environment or urban regeneration influences LTW among adults in deprived areas. Evidence from 13 qualitative studies was synthesized. All studies indicated that safety problems and poor physical neighborhood design make adults fearful of walking. Seven studies indicated that poor aesthetics makes walking less relaxing and stress releasing. Seven studies indicated that poor infrastructure makes it inconvenient for adults to walk. A limited number of studies indicated that a lack of LTW facilities creates a shortage of settings for walking and that low levels of social capital constrain social support for walking and social interaction while walking. Evidence from this study suggests that urban regeneration might stimulate LTW among adults in deprived areas by creating a neighborhood that is less frightening, more relaxing, and more convenient to walk in.

Keywords: area deprivation; neighborhood; realist review; urban regeneration; walking.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Initial program theory.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Refined program theory, with most supported pathways in bold and with an asterisk.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hallal PC, Andersen LB, Bull FC, Guthold R, Haskall W, Ekelund U. Global physical activity levels: surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. Lancet 2012; 380: 247–257. - PubMed
    1. Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Socioeconomic differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med 2002; 35: 601–611. - PubMed
    1. van Lenthe FJ, Brug J, Mackenbach JP. Neighbourhood inequalities in physical inactivity: the role of neighbourhood attractiveness, proximity to local facilities and safety in the Netherlands. Soc Sci Med 2005; 60: 763–775. - PubMed
    1. Kamphuis CBM, Giskes K, Kavanagh AM, et al. Area variation in recreational cycling in Melbourne: a compositional or contextual effect? J Epidemiol Community Health 2008; 62: 890–898. - PubMed
    1. Sallis JF, Bauman A, Pratt M. Environmental and policy interventions to promote physical activity. Am J Prev Med 1998; 15: 379–397. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources