Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2017 Aug 3;8(8):CD011674.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011674.pub2.

Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain

Patrícia Parreira  1 , Martijn W Heymans, Maurits W van Tulder, Rosmin Esmail, Bart W Koes, Nolwenn Poquet, Chung-Wei Christine Lin, Christopher G Maher
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Back Schools for chronic non-specific low back pain

Patrícia Parreira et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Many people with low back pain (LBP) become frequent users of healthcare services in their attempt to find treatments that minimise the severity of their symptoms. Back School consists of a therapeutic programme given to groups of people that includes both education and exercise. However, the content of Back School has changed over time and appears to vary widely today. This review is an update of a Cochrane review of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effectiveness of Back School. We split the Cochrane review into two reviews, one focusing on acute and subacute LBP, and one on chronic LBP.

Objectives: The objective of this systematic review was to determine the effect of Back School on pain and disability for adults with chronic non-specific LBP; we included adverse events as a secondary outcome. In trials that solely recruited workers, we also examined the effect on work status.

Search methods: We searched for trials in the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, two other databases and two trials registers to 15 November 2016. We also searched the reference lists of eligible papers and consulted experts in the field of LBP management to identify any potentially relevant studies we may have missed. We placed no limitations on language or date of publication.

Selection criteria: We included only RCTs and quasi-RCTs evaluating pain, disability, and/or work status as outcomes. The primary outcomes for this update were pain and disability, and the secondary outcomes were work status and adverse events.

Data collection and analysis: Two review authors independently performed the 'Risk of bias' assessment of the included studies using the 'Risk of bias' assessment tool recommended by The Cochrane Collaboration. We summarised the results for the short-, intermediate-, and long-term follow-ups. We evaluated the overall quality of evidence using the GRADE approach.

Main results: For the outcome pain, at short-term follow-up, we found very low-quality evidence that Back School is more effective than no treatment (mean difference (MD) -6.10, 95% confidence interval (CI) -10.18 to -2.01). However, we found very low-quality evidence that there is no significant difference between Back School and no treatment at intermediate-term (MD -4.34, 95% CI -14.37 to 5.68) or long-term follow-up (MD -12.16, 95% CI -29.14 to 4.83). There was very low-quality evidence that Back School reduces pain at short-term follow-up compared to medical care (MD -10.16, 95% CI -19.11 to -1.22). Very low-quality evidence showed there to be no significant difference between Back School and medical care at intermediate-term (MD -9.65, 95% CI -22.46 to 3.15) or long-term follow-up (MD -5.71, 95% CI -20.27 to 8.84). We found very low-quality evidence that Back School is no more effective than passive physiotherapy at short-term (MD 1.96, 95% CI -9.51 to 13.43), intermediate-term (MD -16.89, 95% CI -66.56 to 32.79), or long-term follow-up (MD -12.86, 95% CI -61.22 to 35.50). There was very low-quality evidence that Back School is no better than exercise at short- term follow-up (MD -2.06, 95% CI -14.58 to 10.45). There was low-quality evidence that Back School is no better than exercise at intermediate-term (MD -4.46, 95% CI -19.44 to 10.52) and long-term follow-up (MD 4.58, 95% CI -0.20 to 9.36).For the outcome disability, we found very low-quality evidence that Back School is no more effective than no treatment at intermediate-term (MD -5.92, 95% CI -12.08 to 0.23) and long-term follow-up (MD -7.36, 95% CI -22.05 to 7.34); medical care at short-term (MD -1.19, 95% CI -7.02 to 4.64) and long-term follow-up (MD -0.40, 95% CI -7.33 to 6.53); passive physiotherapy at short-term (MD 2.57, 95% CI -15.88 to 21.01) and intermediate-term follow-up (MD 6.88, 95% CI -4.86 to 18.63); and exercise at short-term (MD -1.65, 95% CI -8.66 to 5.37), intermediate-term (MD 1.57, 95% CI -3.86 to 7.00), and long-term follow-up (MD 4.54, 95% CI -4.44 to 13.52). We found very low-quality evidence of a small difference between Back School and no treatment at short-term follow-up (MD -3.38, 95% CI -6.70 to -0.05) and medical care at intermediate-term follow-up (MD -6.34, 95% CI -10.89 to -1.79). Still, at long-term follow-up there was very low-quality evidence that passive physiotherapy is better than Back School (MD 9.60, 95% CI 3.65 to 15.54).Few studies measured adverse effects. The results were reported as means without standard deviations or group size was not reported. Due to this lack of information, we were unable to statistically pool the adverse events data. Work status was not reported.

Authors' conclusions: Due to the low- to very low-quality of the evidence for all treatment comparisons, outcomes, and follow-up periods investigated, it is uncertain if Back School is effective for chronic low back pain. Although the quality of the evidence was mostly very low, the results showed no difference or a trivial effect in favour of Back School. There are myriad potential variants on the Back School approach regarding the employment of different exercises and educational methods. While current evidence does not warrant their use, future variants on Back School may have different effects and will need to be studied in future RCTs and reviews.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

PP, MH, RE, BK, NP, CL have no conflicts of interest.

Two review authors (CM and MvT) are on the Editorial Board of the Cochrane Back and Neck Review Group. Editors are required to conduct at least one Cochrane review, which ensures that they are aware of the processes and commitment needed to conduct reviews.

Figures

1
1
Study flow diagram.
2
2
Risk of bias summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Back School versus no treatment, Outcome 1 Pain.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Back School versus no treatment, Outcome 2 Disability.
2.1
2.1. Analysis
Comparison 2 Back School versus medical care, Outcome 1 Pain.
2.2
2.2. Analysis
Comparison 2 Back School versus medical care, Outcome 2 Disability.
3.1
3.1. Analysis
Comparison 3 Back School versus passive physiotherapy, Outcome 1 Pain.
3.2
3.2. Analysis
Comparison 3 Back School versus passive physiotherapy, Outcome 2 Disability.
4.1
4.1. Analysis
Comparison 4 Back school versus exercise, Outcome 1 Pain.
4.2
4.2. Analysis
Comparison 4 Back school versus exercise, Outcome 2 Disability.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Comment in

References

References to studies included in this review

Andrade 2008 {published data only}
    1. Andrade SC, Araújo AG, Vilar MJ. Back school for patients with non‐specific chronic low‐back pain: benefits from the association of an exercise program with patient's education. Acta Reumatologica Portuguesa 2008;33:443‐50. - PubMed
Berwick 1989 {published data only}
    1. Berwick DM, Budman S, Feldstein M. No clinical effect of back schools in an HMO. A randomized prospective trial. Spine 1989;14:339‐44. - PubMed
Cecchi 2010a {published data only}
    1. Cecchi F, Molino‐Lova R, Chiti M, Pasquini G, Paperini A, Conti AA, et al. Spinal manipulation compared with back school and with individually delivered physiotherapy for the treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized trial with one‐year follow‐up. Clinical Rehabilitation 2010;24:26‐36. - PubMed
Costantino 2014 {published data only}
    1. Costantino C, Romiti D. Effectiveness of Back School program versus hydrotherapy in elderly patients with chronic non‐specific low back pain: a randomized clinical trial. Acta Bio Medica 2014;85(3):52‐61. - PubMed
Dalichau 1999 {published data only}
    1. Dalichau S, Perrey RM, Solbach T, Elliehausen H‐J. Experience in the implementation of a professional back‐school model in the construction industry [Erfahrungen bei der Durchführung eines berufsbezogenen Rückenschulmodells im Baugewerbe]. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin 1998;48:72‐80.
    1. Dalichau S, Scheele K, Perrey RM, Elliehausen H‐J, Huebner J. Ultrasonic supported posture and motion analysis of the lumbar spine to demonstrate the effectiveness of a back school [Ultraschallgestützte Haltungs‐ und Bewegungsanalyse der Lendenwirbelsäule zum Nachweis der Wirksamkeit einer Rückenschule]. Zentralblatt für Arbeitsmedizin 1999;49:148‐56.
Devasahayam 2014 {published data only}
    1. Devasahayam A, Lim C, Goh M, Lim You J, Ying Pua P. Delivering a Back School programme with a cognitive behavioural modification: a randomised pilot trial on patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain and functional disability. Proceedings of Singapore Healthcare 2014;23(3):218‐25.
Donchin 1990 {published data only}
    1. Donchin M, Woolf O, Kaplan L, Floman Y. Secondary prevention of low‐back pain. A clinical trial. Spine 1990;15:1317‐20. - PubMed
Donzelli 2006 {published data only}
    1. Donzelli S, Domenica F, Cova AM, Galletti R, Giunta N. Two different techniques in the rehabilitation treatment of low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Europa Medicophysica 2006;42:205‐10. - PubMed
Dufour 2010 {published data only}
    1. Dufour N, Thamsborg G, Oefeldt A, Lundsgaard C, Stender S. Treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, clinical trial comparing group‐based multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation and intensive individual therapist‐assisted back muscle strengthening exercises. Spine 2010;35:469‐76. - PubMed
Durmus 2014 {published data only}
    1. Durmus D, Unal M, Kuru O. How effective is a modified exercise program on its own or with back school in chronic low back pain? A randomized‐controlled clinical trial. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2014;27(4):553‐61. - PubMed
Garcia 2013 {published data only}
    1. Garcia AN, Costa Lda C, Silva TM, Gondo FL, Cyrillo FN, Costa RA, et al. Effectiveness of back school versus McKenzie exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2013;93:729‐47. - PubMed
    1. Garcia AN, Costa Lda C, Silva TM, Gondo FL, Cyrillo FN, Costa RA, et al. Effects of two physical therapy interventions in patients with chronic non‐specific low back pain: feasibility of a randomized controlled trial. Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy 2011;15:420‐7. - PubMed
Heymans 2006 {published data only}
    1. Heymans MW, Vet HCW, Bongers PM, Knol DL, Koes BW, Mechelen W. The effectiveness of high‐intensity versus low‐intensity back schools in an occupational setting: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Spine 2006;31:1075‐82. - PubMed
Hurri 1989 {published data only}
    1. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low‐back pain. Part I. Benefits. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1989;21:33‐40. - PubMed
    1. Hurri H. The Swedish back school in chronic low‐back pain. Part II. Factors predicting the outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1989;21:41‐4. - PubMed
    1. Julkunen J, Hurri H, Kankainen J. Psychological factors in the treatment of chronic low back pain. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 1988;50:173‐81. - PubMed
Jaromi 2012 {published data only}
    1. Jaromi M, Nemeth A, Kranicz J, Laczko T, Betlehem J. Treatment and ergonomics training of work‐related lower back pain and body posture problems for nurses. Journal of Clinical Nursing 2012;21:1776‐84. - PubMed
Keijsers 1989 {published data only}
    1. Keijsers JFEM, Groenman NH, Gerards FM, Oudheusden E, Steenbakkers M. A back school in the Netherlands: Evaluating the results. Patient Education & Counseling 1989;14:31‐44. - PubMed
Keijsers 1990 {published data only}
    1. Keijsers JFME, Steenbakkers WHL, Meertens RM, Bouter LM, Kok GJ. The efficacy of the back school: A randomized trial. Arthritis Care and Research 1990;3:204‐9.
Klaber Moffett 1986 {published data only}
    1. Klaber Moffett JA, Chase SM, Portek I, Ennis JR. A controlled prospective study to evaluate the effectiveness of a back school in the relief of chronic low‐back pain. Spine 1986;11:120‐2. - PubMed
Lankhorst 1983 {published data only}
    1. Lankhorst GJ, Stadt RJ, Vogelaar TW, Korst JK, Prevo AJH. The effect of the Swedish back school in chronic idiopathic low‐back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1983;15:141‐5. - PubMed
Lønn 1999 {published data only}
    1. Glomsrød B, Lønn JH, Soukup MG, Bø K, Larsen S. Active back school, prophylactic management for low back pain: Three‐year follow‐up of a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2001;33:26‐30. - PubMed
    1. Lønn JH, Glomsrød B, Soukup MG, Bø K, Larsen S. Active back school: Prophylactic management for low back pain. A randomized controlled 1‐year follow‐up study. Spine 1999;24:865‐71. - PubMed
Meng 2009 {published data only}
    1. Meng K, Seekatz B, Rossband H, Worringen U, Faller H, Vogel H. Development of a standardized back school for in‐patient orthopaedic rehabilitation. Rehabilitation 2009;48:335‐44. - PubMed
Morone 2011 {published data only}
    1. Morone G, Paolucci T, Alcuri MR, Vulpiani MC, Matano A, Bureca I, et al. Quality of life improved by multidisciplinary back school program in patients with chronic non‐specific low back pain: a single blind randomized controlled trial. European Journal of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine 2011;47:533‐41. - PubMed
Morone 2012 {published data only}
    1. Morone G, Iosa M, Paolucci T, Fusco A, Alcuri R, Spadini E, et al. Efficacy of perceptive rehabilitation in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain through a new tool: a randomized clinical study. Clinical Rehabilitation 2012;26:339‐50. - PubMed
Nentwig 1990 {published data only}
    1. Nentwig CG, Ullrich CH. Effectiveness of a behavioral training for spinal column patients: a prospective controlled study [Wirksamkeit eines Verhaltenstrainings fur Wirbelsaulen patienten: eine prospektive kontrollierte studie]. Orthopädie und orthopädische Chirurgie 1990;3:888‐92.
Paolucci 2012a {published data only}
    1. Paolucci T, Fusco A, Iosa M, Grasso MR, Spadini E, Paolucci S, et al. The efficacy of a perceptive rehabilitation on postural control in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research 2012;35:360‐6. - PubMed
Paolucci 2012b {published data only}
    1. Paolucci T, Morone G, Iosa M, Fusco A, Alcuri R, Matano A, et al. Psychological features and outcomes of the Back School treatment in patients with chronic non‐specific low back pain. A randomized controlled study. European Journal of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine 2012;48:245‐53. - PubMed
Penttinen 2002 {published data only}
    1. Penttinen J, Nevala‐Puranen N, Airaksinen O, Jaaskelainen M, Sintonen H, Takala J. Randomized controlled trial of back school with and without peer support. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation 2002;12:21‐9. - PubMed
Postacchini 1988 {published data only}
    1. Postacchini F, Facchini M, Palieri P. Efficacy of various forms of conservative treatment in low‐back pain. A comparative study. Neuro‐Orthopedics 1988;6:28‐35.
Ribeiro 2008 {published data only}
    1. Ribeiro LH, Jennings F, Jones A, Furtado R, Natour J. Effectiveness of a back school program in low back pain. Clinical & Experimental Rheumatology 2008;26:81‐8. - PubMed
Sahin 2011 {published data only}
    1. Sahin N, Albayrak I, Durmus B, Ugurlu H. Effectiveness of back school for treatment of pain and functional disability in patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2011;43:224‐9. - PubMed
Tavafian 2007 {published data only}
    1. Tavafian SS, Jamshidi A, Mohammad K, Montazeri A. Low back pain education and short term quality of life: a randomized trial. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2007;8:1‐6. - PMC - PubMed

References to studies excluded from this review

Bergquist 1977 {published data only}
    1. Bergquist‐Ullman M, Larsson U. Acute low‐back pain in industry. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 1977;170:1‐117. - PubMed
Cecchi 2010b {published data only}
    1. Cecchi F, Molino‐Lova R, Chiti M, Pasquini G, Paperini A, Conti AA, et al. Spinal manipulation provides better short and long‐term reduction in pain and disability for patients with non‐specific chronic low back pain. Clinical Rehabilitation 2010;24:26‐36. - PubMed
Demoulin 2006 {published data only}
    1. Demoulin C, Tomasella M, Croisier J‐L, Crielaard J‐M, Vanderthommen M. Benefits of a physical training program after back school for chronic low back pain patients. Journal of Musculoskeletal Pain 2006;14:21‐31.
Härkäpää 1989 {published data only}
    1. Härkäpää K, Järvikoski A, Mellin G, Hurri H. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part I. Pain, disability, compliance, and reported treatment benefits three months after treatment. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1989;21(2):81‐9. - PubMed
Härkäpää 1990 {published data only}
    1. Härkäpää K, Mellin G, Järvikoski A, Hurri H. A controlled study on the outcome of inpatient and outpatient treatment of low back pain. Part III. Long‐term follow‐up of pain, disability, and compliance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1990;22(4):181‐8. - PubMed
Herzog 1991 {published data only}
    1. Herzog W, Conway PJW, Willcox BJ. Effects of different treatment modalities on gait symmetry and clinical measures for sacroiliac joint patients. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics 1991;14:104‐9. - PubMed
Hsieh 2002 {published data only}
    1. Hsieh CY, Adams AH, Tobis J, Hong CZ, Danielson C, Platt K, et al. Effectiveness of four conservative treatments for subacute low back pain: A randomized clinical trial. Spine 2002;27:1142‐8. - PubMed
Indahl 1995 {published data only}
    1. Indahl A, Haldorsen EH, Holm S, Reikeras O, Ursin H. Five‐year follow‐up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine 1998;23:2625‐30. - PubMed
    1. Indahl A, Velund L, Reikeraas O. Good prognosis for low back pain when left untampered. A randomized clinical trial. Spine 1995;20:473‐7. - PubMed
Indahl 1998 {published data only}
    1. Indahl A, Haldorsen EH, Holm S, Reikeras O, Ursin H. Five‐year follow‐up study of a controlled clinical trial using light mobilization and an informative approach to low back pain. Spine 1998;23(23):2625‐30. - PubMed
Leclaire 1996 {published data only}
    1. Leclaire R, Esdaile JM, Suissa S, Rossignol M, Proulx R, Dupuis M. Back school in a first episode of compensated acute low back pain: a clinical trial to assess efficacy and prevent relapse. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1996;77:673‐9. - PubMed
Lindequist 1984 {published data only}
    1. Lindequist SL, Lundberg B, Wikmark R, Bergstad B, Loof G, Ottermark AC. Information and regime at low‐back pain. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 1984;16:113‐6. - PubMed
Linton 1989 {published data only}
    1. Linton SJ, Bradley LA, Jensen I, Spangfort E, Sundell L. The secondary prevention of low back pain: a controlled study with follow‐up. Pain 1989;36:197‐207. - PubMed
Maul 2005 {published data only}
    1. Maul I, Oliveri M, Krueger H. Long‐term effects of supervised physical training in secondary prevention of low back pain. European Spine Journal 2005;14:599‐611. - PMC - PubMed
Mele 2006 {published data only}
    1. Mele G, Domenica F, Locati F, Gattoronchieri V, Silingardi M. Rehabilitation, physical therapy or Back School. Reumatismo 2006;28:102‐5. - PubMed
Meng 2011 {published data only}
    1. Meng K, Seekatz B, Roband H, Worringen U, Vogel H, Faller H. Intermediate and long‐term effects of a standardized back school for inpatient orthopedic rehabilitation on illness knowledge and self‐management behaviours: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Journal of Pain 2011;27:248‐57. - PubMed
Morrison 1988 {published data only}
    1. Morrison GEC, Chase W, Young V, Roberts WL. Back pain. Treatment and prevention in a community hospital. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 1988;69:605‐9. - PubMed
Sadeghi‐Abdollahi 2012 {published data only}
    1. Sadeghi‐Abdollahi B, Eshaghi A, Hosseini SN, Ghahremani M, Davatchi F. The efficacy of Back School on chronic low back pain of workers of a pharmaceutical company in a Tehran suburb. International Journal of the Rheumatic Diseases 2012;15:144‐53. - PubMed
Tavafian 2008 {published data only}
    1. Tavafian SS, Jamshidi AR, Montazeri A. A randomized study of back school in women with chronic low back pain: quality of life at three, six, and twelve months follow‐up. Spine 2008;33(15):1617‐21. - PubMed
Yang 2010 {published data only}
    1. Yang EJ, Park WB, Shin HI, Lim JY. The effect of back school integrated with core strengthening in patients with chronic low‐back pain. American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 2010;89:744‐54. - PubMed

References to studies awaiting assessment

Garcia 2016 {published data only}
    1. Garcia A, Costa LCM, Hancock M, Costa L. Identifying patients with chronic low back pain who respond best to mechanical diagnosis and therapy: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Physical Therapy 2016;96(5):623‐30. - PubMed
Paolucci 2016 {published data only}
    1. NCT02231554. Feldenkrais vs back school for treating chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02231554 (first received 8 August 2014).
    1. Paolucci T, Zangrando F, Iosa M, Angelis S, Marzoli C, Piccinini G, et al. Improved interoceptive awareness in chronic low back pain: a comparison of Back school versus Feldenkrais method. Disability & Rehabilitation 2016;23(1):8. - PubMed

References to ongoing studies

IRCT201010184251N2 {published data only}
    1. IRCT2015093024277N1. The effect of lumbar care (based on Back School) on nursing staff’s low back pain and functional disability. http://apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial2.aspx?TrialID=IRCT2015093024277N1 (first received 25 November 2015).

Additional references

Airaksinen 2006
    1. Airaksinen O, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, Hildebrandt J, Klaber‐Moffett J, Kovacs F. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. European Spine Journal 2006;15(Suppl 2):s169–91. - PMC - PubMed
Duffy 2014
    1. Duffy S, Misso K, Noake C, Ross J, Stirk L. Supplementary searches of PubMed to improve currency of MEDLINE and MEDLINE In‐Process searches via OvidSP. Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York. Poster presented at the UK InterTASC Information Specialists' Sub‐Group (ISSG) Workshop; 2014 July 9; Exeter: UK. medicine.exeter.ac.uk/media/universityofexeter/medicalschool/research/pe... (accessed 6 August 2014).
European Guidelines 2006
    1. COST Action B13 Working Group. European Guidelines for the Management of Non‐Specific Low Back Pain. European Spine Journal 2006;15(Suppl 2):S1‐S300.
Forssell 1980
    1. Forssell MZ. The Swedish back school. Physiotherapy 1980;66:112‐4. - PubMed
Forssell 1981
    1. Forssell MZ. The back school. Spine 1981;6:104‐6. - PubMed
Furlan 2015
    1. Furlan AD, Malmivaara A, Chou R, Maher CG, Deyo RA, Schoene M, et al. 2015 Updated Method Guideline for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Back and Neck Group. Spine 2015;40(21):1660‐73. - PubMed
Hayden 2005
    1. Hayden JA, Tulder MW, Malmivaara A, Koes BW. Exercise therapy for treatment of non‐specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2005, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000335.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
Mueller 2007
    1. Mueller PS, Montori VM, Bassler D, Koenig BA, Guyatt GH. Ethical issues in stopping randomized trials early because of apparent benefit. Ideas and Opinions 2007;146:878‐82. - PubMed
Murray 2013
    1. Murray CJ, Lopez AD. Measuring the global burden of disease. New England Journal of Medicine 2013;369:448‐57. - PubMed
Parsons 2007
    1. Parsons S, Harding G, Breen A, Foster N, Pincus T, Vogel S, Underwood M. The influence of patients' and primary care practitioners' beliefs and expectations about chronicmusculoskeletal pain on the process of care: a systematic review of qualitative studies. [The Clinical Journal of Pain]. Clin J Pain 2007;23(1):91‐8. - PubMed
van Tulder 2003
    1. Tulder M, Furlan A, Bombardier C, Bouter L, Editorial Board of The Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in The Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2003;28:1290‐9. - PubMed
van Tulder 2006
    1. Tulder M, Becker A, Bekkering T, Breen A, Real MT, Hutchinson A. Chapter 3. European guidelines for the management of acute nonspecific low back pain in primary care. European Spine Journal 2006;15 Suppl 2:S169‐91. - PMC - PubMed
Vos 2010
    1. Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990‐2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2013;380:2163‐96. - PMC - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Heymans 2004
    1. Heymans M, Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for non‐specific low‐back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000261.pub2] - DOI - PMC - PubMed
Heymans 2005
    1. Heymans MW, Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of The Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine 2005;30(19):2153‐63. - PubMed
van Tulder 1999
    1. Tulder MW, Esmail R, Bombardier C, Koes BW. Back schools for non‐specific low back pain. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 1999, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD000261.pub2] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources