Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2017 Aug;9(12):1401-1411.
doi: 10.4155/fmc-2017-0047. Epub 2017 Aug 3.

Activity of a novel protonophore against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Affiliations

Activity of a novel protonophore against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Nagendran Tharmalingam et al. Future Med Chem. 2017 Aug.

Abstract

Aim: Compound 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4,4-trifluoro-3-hydroxy-2-buten-1-one (compound 1) was identified as a hit against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain MW2.

Methods & results: The MIC of compound 1 against MRSA was 4 μg/ml. The compound showed enhanced activity at acidic pH by lowering bacterial intracellular pH and exhibited no lysis of human red blood cells at up to 64 μg/ml and its IC50 against HepG2 cells was 32 μg/ml. The compound reduced 1-log10 colony forming units of intracellular MRSA in macrophages and prolonged the survival of MRSA-infected Caenorhabditis elegans (p = 0.0015) and Galleria mellonella (p = 0.0002).

Conclusion: Compound 1 is a protonophore with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against MRSA and no toxicity in mammalian cells up to 8 μg/ml that warrants further investigation as a novel antibacterial.

Keywords: Galleria mellonella; MRSA infection; S. aureus; antibiotic; macrophages; protonophore.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interest disclosure

This study was supported by NIH grant P01 AI083214 to E Mylonakis. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.

No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

<b>Figure 1.</b>
Figure 1.. Structure of 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4,4-trifluoro-3-hydroxy-2-buten-1-one (compound 1).
<b>Figure 2.</b>
Figure 2.. In vitro killing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus MW2 cells by compound 1.
(A) Time to kill assays: MRSA MW2 (108 cells/ml) were treated with DMSO or compound 1 (16 μg/ml, 4× MIC) or gentamicin (8 μg/ml, 4× MIC) and CFUs enumerated after incubating for various times. (B) Killing of MRSA MW2 in RAW 264.7 macrophages. Macrophages were exposed to MRSA-MW2 cells (MOI = 25) for 2 h. Extracellular bacteria were killed by treatment with gentamicin (200 μg/ml) for 2 h and the macrophages exposed to 2× MIC compound 1 (8 μg/ml), 2× MIC vancomycin (8 μg/ml) or DMSO control for 20 h. Cells were lysed and the bacteria were plated and counted. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). CFU: Colony forming unit; MOI: Multiplicity of infection; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
<b>Figure 3.</b>
Figure 3.. Effect of pH on antibacterial activity.
The MICs of compound 1, vancomycin and gentamicin were measured against MRSA MW2 at pH: (A) 5.0, (B) 6.0, (C) 7.0 and (D) 8.0. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
<b>Figure 4.</b>
Figure 4.. Intracellular pH and membrane permeability.
(A) Staphylococcus aureus intracellular pH: MRSA-MW2 cells preloaded with the fluorescence pH indicator probe AM-BCECF were treated with 10 μg/ml of compound 1, vancomycin, CCCP or DMSO (negative control) and fluorescence measurements taken. (B) Membrane permeabilization by compound 1: MRSA-MW2 cells were loaded with the membrane impermeable nucleic acid stain Sytox green and treated with compound 1 (3.125–50 μg/ml) and the fluorescence was measured at regular time interval post treatment. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3). AM-BCECF: Acetoxymethyl ester, 2′,7′-bis-(2-carboxyethyl)-5-(and-6)-carboxyfluorescein; CCCP: Carbonyl cyanide m-chlorophenylhydrazone; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
<b>Figure 5.</b>
Figure 5.. Hemolysis and cytotoxicity assays.
(A) Hemolytic activity of compound 1: human erythrocytes were treated with various concentrations of compound 1 (0.06–64 μg/ml) or Triton X-100 (0.001 to 1.0%) for 1 h and the supernatant was examined for hemolysis. (B) Cytotoxicity of compound 1 in HepG2 cells: HepG2 cells were treated with increasing concentrations of compound 1 (0.125–64 μg/ml) and incubated for 24, 48 or 72 h. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 3).
<b>Figure 6.</b>
Figure 6.. Whole animal Staphylococcus aureus infection models.
(A) Bright field and Sytox orange stained images of MRSA-MW2 infected Caenorhabditis elegans in the presence of DMSO (1%), compound 1 (2.86 μg/ml) or vancomycin (10 μg/ml). Images were obtained from the original HTS campaign. (B) Rescue of C. elegans nematodes infected with MRSA MW2 by compound 1 over the concentration range of 0.5–64 μg/ml. Data represent the mean ± SD (n = 15). (C) Galleria mellonella survival assay: Compound 1 (25 mg/kg) was administrated into the last right proleg before (prophylactic) or after (therapeutic) bacterial inoculation (2 × 106 cells/ml). Vancomycin (25 mg/kg) and DMSO or no injection were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. HTS: High-throughput screening; MRSA: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wertheim HF, Melles DC, Vos MC, et al. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2005;5(12):751–762. - PubMed
    1. Mulligan ME, Murray-Leisure KA, Ribner BS, et al. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a consensus review of the microbiology, pathogenesis, and epidemiology with implications for prevention and management. Am. J. Med. 1993;94(3):313–328. - PubMed
    1. Tong SY, Davis JS, Eichenberger E, Holland TL, Fowler VG., Jr Staphylococcus aureus infections: epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and management. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2015;28(3):603–661. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Truong-Bolduc QC, Bolduc GR, Okumura R, et al. Implication of the NorB efflux pump in the adaptation of Staphylococcus aureus to growth at acid pH and in resistance to moxifloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2011;55(7):3214–3219. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jensen MS, Bainton DF. Temporal changes in pH within the phagocytic vacuole of the polymorphonuclear neutrophilic leukocyte. J. Cell Biol. 1973;56(2):379–388. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources